<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Andrew S. Erickson &#187; Edited Volumes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.andrewerickson.com/category/edited-volumes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.andrewerickson.com</link>
	<description>China analysis from original sources</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 00:50:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Chinese Aerospace Power: Evolving Maritime Roles (CMSI Vol. 5)</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewerickson.com/2011/06/chinese-aerospace-power-evolving-maritime-roles-cmsi-vol-5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.andrewerickson.com/2011/06/chinese-aerospace-power-evolving-maritime-roles-cmsi-vol-5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 12:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andrewserickson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edited Volumes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japanese Language 日本語]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewerickson.com/?p=2529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Andrew S. Erickson and Lyle J. Goldstein, eds., Chinese Aerospace Power: Evolving Maritime Roles (Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press, 2011).
Japanese summary translation now available: 中国の航空宇宙パワー海洋任務への発展.
Highlighted in GlobalSecurity.org’s Special Selections. 
Author of “Beijing’s Aerospace Revolution: Short-Range Opportunities, Long-Range Challenges,” 3-18.
Coauthor, with Jing-Dong Yuan, of “Antiaccess and China’s Air-Launched Cruise Missiles,” 275-86;
and, with David Yang, of “Chinese [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Chinese Aerospace Power--Flyer" href="http://www.andrewerickson.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Chinese-Aerospace-Power_Japanese-Summary_JANAFA.pdf" target="_blank"><strong>Andrew S. Erickson and Lyle J. Goldstein</strong></a><strong>,</strong><a title="Chinese Aerospace Power--Book News" href="http://www.andrewerickson.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Chinese-Aerospace-Power_Book-News.doc" target="_blank"><strong> eds.</strong></a><strong>, </strong><a title="Chinese Aerospace Power--Amazon.com Link" href="http://www.amazon.com/Chinese-Aerospace-Power-Evolving-Maritime/dp/1591142415/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1288913334&amp;sr=1-1" target="_blank"><em><strong>Chinese Aerospace Power: Evolving Maritime Roles</strong></em></a><strong> (</strong><a title="Chinese Aerospace Power--Naval Institute Press Website" href="http://www.usni.org/store/books/aviation/chinese-aerospace-power" target="_blank"><strong>Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press, 2011</strong></a><strong>).</strong></p>
<p><a title="Chinese Aerospace Power--Japanese Summary" href="http://www.andrewerickson.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Chinese-Aerospace-Power_Japanese-Summary_JANAFA.pdf" target="_blank"><strong>Japanese</strong></a><strong> summary translation now available: </strong><a title="Chinese Aerospace Power--Japanese Summary" href="http://www.andrewerickson.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Chinese-Aerospace-Power_Japanese-Summary_JANAFA.pdf" target="_blank"><strong>中国の航空宇宙パワー海洋任務への発展</strong></a><strong>.</strong></p>
<p style="BACKGROUND: white"><strong><span style="COLOR: #3f312e"><a title="GlobalSecurity.org Special Selections" href="http://www.globalsecurity.org/books/index.html" target="_blank">Highlighted in GlobalSecurity.org’s Special Selections</a>.</span></strong><span style="COLOR: #3f312e"> </span></p>
<p><script type="text/javascript"></script>Author of “Beijing’s Aerospace Revolution: Short-Range Opportunities, Long-Range Challenges,” 3-18.</p>
<p>Coauthor, with Jing-Dong Yuan, of “Antiaccess and China’s Air-Launched Cruise Missiles,” 275-86;</p>
<p>and, with David Yang, of “Chinese Analysts Assess the Potential for Antiship Ballistic Missiles,” 328-42.</p>
<p><strong>For a video introducing the volume’s contents, watch Prof. Andrew S. Erickson, </strong><strong><a title="Prof. Andrew S. Erickson, “Chinese Aerospace Power: Evolving Maritime Roles,” Eight Bells Book Lecture, Naval War College Museum, 8 September 2011." href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VdMDz35ZdU4" target="_blank">Eight Bells Book Lecture</a>, Naval War College Museum, 8 September 2011.</strong></p>
<p><iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/VdMDz35ZdU4" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p><strong><a title="Chinese Aerospace Power--Table of Contents" href="http://www.andrewerickson.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/Chinese-Aerospace-Power_TOC.pdf" target="_blank">TABLE OF CONTENTS</a></strong></p>
<p><strong><a title="Contributor Bios" href="http://www.andrewerickson.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Chinese-Aerospace-Power_Contributor-Bios.pdf" target="_blank">ABOUT THE CONTRIBUTORS</a></strong></p>
<p><em>China’s aircraft carrier program is already making major waves well before the first ship has even been completed. Undoubtedly, this development heralds a new era in Chinese national security policy. While </em>Chinese Aerospace Power<em> presents substantial new insight on that particular question, its main focus is decidedly broader in scope. This book offers a comprehensive survey of Chinese aerospace developments, with a concentration on areas of potential strategic significance previously unexplored in Western scholarship. It also links these developments to the vast maritime battlespace of the Asia-Pacific region and highlights the consequent implications for the U.S. military, particularly the U.S. Navy.</em></p>
<p><em>The possibility of a future Chinese expeditionary force operating off Africa under the protective umbrella of carrier aircraft is not without consequence for the global strategic balance. However, a simpler set of aerospace systems, from microsatellites to unmanned aerial vehicles to ballistic and cruise missiles are already challenging U.S. maritime dominance in East Asia. Cumulatively, progress in all major aerospace dimensions by various elements of the People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) signifies a new period in which Chinese forces are now decisively altering the complexion of the military balance in the East Asian littoral.</em></p>
<p><em>While many articles and books have previously been written on Chinese aerospace development and many more discuss future U.S. naval strategy in the Asia-Pacific region, no other book connects the two issues, simultaneously evaluating the Chinese aerospace challenge and its implications for U.S. naval strategy.</em></p>
<p>Chinese Aerospace Power <em>offers both broad strategic context for the lay reader and considerable insights for even the most well-informed specialists, with no fewer than five chapters devoting coverage to significant aspects of China’s development of a “carrier killer” anti-ship ballistic missile (ASBM).</em></p>
<p>Publication date: July 2011</p>
<p>512 pp., 2 b/w photos, 15 illustrations, 6” x 9”</p>
<p>ISBN: 978-159114-241-6</p>
<p>Political Science, International Relations</p>
<p>This is the fifth volume in the Naval Institute Press series “Studies in Chinese Maritime Development” published jointly by the China Maritime Studies Institute and the Naval Institute Press. <a title="Studies in Chinese Maritime Development" href="http://www.andrewerickson.com/category/edited-volumes/" target="_blank">Click here for information regarding previous volumes in the series</a>.</p>
<p><em><strong>China, the United States, and 21<sup>st</sup> Century Sea Power</strong></em></p>
<p><em> </em>Edited by Andrew S. Erickson, Lyle J. Goldstein, and Nan Li</p>
<p>ISBN: 978-1-59114-243-0</p>
<p><em><strong>China Goes to Sea: Maritime Transformation in Comparative Historical Perspective</strong></em></p>
<p>Edited by Andrew S. Erickson, Lyle J. Goldstein, and Carnes Lord</p>
<p>ISBN: 978-1-59114-242-3</p>
<p><em><strong>China’s Energy Strategy: The Impact on Beijing’s Maritime Policies</strong></em></p>
<p>Edited by Gabriel B. Collins, Andrew S. Erickson, Lyle J. Goldstein, and William S. Murray</p>
<p>ISBN: 978-1-59114-330-7</p>
<p><em><strong>China’s Future Nuclear Submarine Force</strong></em></p>
<p>Edited Andrew S. Erickson, Lyle J. Goldstein, William S. Murray, and Andrew R. Wilson</p>
<p>ISBN: 978-1-59114-326-0</p>
<p><strong>Andrew S. Erickson</strong><strong> </strong>is an associate professor in the U.S. Naval War College’s Strategic Research Department and a founding member of its China Maritime Studies Institute (CMSI). He is an Associate in Research at Harvard University’s Fairbank Center for Chinese Studies and a Fellow in the National Committee on U.S.-China Relations’ Public Intellectuals Program.</p>
<p><strong>Lyle J. Goldstein</strong> is an associate professor in the Strategic Research Department at the U.S. Naval War College, and the founding director of the department’s China Maritime Studies Institute. He is proficient in Chinese and Russian, and has published widely in scholarly journals on China, Russia, Central Asia, and surface and undersea warfare.</p>
<p><strong>BLURBS</strong></p>
<p>“In this edited volume, Erickson and Goldstein provide us with a comprehensive survey of China’s ongoing efforts to shift the military balance in the Western Pacific decisively in its favor through the development and application of aerospace power as it pertains to the maritime competition. Drawing upon primary research and Chinese sources, this volume will be a valuable and timely addition to the libraries of those with an interest in this issue of growing geostrategic importance.”</p>
<p><strong>—Dr. Andrew F. Krepinevich Jr.,</strong><strong> </strong>President of the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, author of <em>7 Deadly Scenarios: A Military Futurist Explores the Changing Face of War in the 21st Century</em></p>
<p>“This coverage of this book is at once broad and deep. It serves well as an introduction to advances in Chinese maritime aerospace technology, and it will also reward expert readers looking for the latest update on these evolving capabilities. Many readers will be surprised by the extent of Chinese progress described by the contributors to this work. Assembling evidence from a necessarily diverse range of sources, they detail the strategic as well as the technical issues that are shaping the Chinese military establishment as it looks beyond the country’s shores, and they examine how it will develop in coming years and decades.”</p>
<p><strong>—Bradley Perrett</strong>, Asia-Pacific bureau chief, <em>Aviation Week</em>, Beijing</p>
<p>“<em>Chinese Aerospace Power</em> is an excellent and very readable overview of China’s impressive advances in almost every aspect of air and space operations. Not only have the Chinese developed impressive technical capabilities, but they have also given careful thought to the operational concepts associated with them. There is no reason that China must be an enemy of the United States, but it would be folly on our part if we were to lose to China the across-the-board technology lead that has been vital to our national security for well over a half century. This is a must read for anyone with a concern for American or Chinese military affairs.”</p>
<p><strong>—Col. John A. Warden III, USAF (Ret.),</strong> Gulf War I planner, president of Venturist, Inc., author of <em>The Air Campaign</em> and <em>Winning in FastTime</em></p>
<p>“<em>Chinese Aerospace Power </em>arrives on the scene as the United States is facing declining resources for defense while the Chinese are realizing rapid expansion of its military capabilities in the aerospace and maritime domains. Andrew Erickson and Lyle Goldstein yield timely insight into how these two trends are evolving in these arenas. Resolving the security objectives of the United States and China in the Pacific—and around the world—requires that policymakers and military strategists understand the reality of Chinese military capability, experiences, and perspectives. This work provides that insight and is a must read as Chinese aerospace development is significantly altering the character of the military and political balance in the Pacific.”</p>
<p><strong>—Lt. General David A. Deptula, USAF (Ret.),</strong> former USAF Deputy Chief of Staff for Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance</p>
<p>“Absolutely the most important book on air and space power I’ve had the pleasure to read. The power of this detailed survey of <em>Chinese Aerospace Power</em> is doubled because it presents both an intelligent American analysis and an insightful view of the ‘Chinese perception’ of the situation. Our two nations have much in common, but the understanding this difference in perception is essential to our selection of our future alternatives. A must have book!”</p>
<p><strong>—Col. Walter J. Boyne, USAF (Ret.),</strong> National Aviation Hall of Fame honoree and former director of the National Air and Space Museum, author of <em>Beyond the Wild Blue: A History of the U.S. Air Force, 1947-2007</em></p>
<p>“China’s air and space development is an area of significant interest for the U.S. Navy. This book elucidates the critical linkage between China’s military aerospace and maritime capabilities. Whereas China’s rapid progress has already rendered many other studies obsolete, this volume connects the latest ‘data point’ dots and puts them in strategic context. Navy leaders and planners should read it today.”</p>
<p><strong>—Admiral Timothy J. Keating, USN (Ret.)</strong><strong>, </strong>former Commander-in-Chief, U.S. Pacific Command</p>
<p><strong>REVIEWS</strong></p>
<p>“this volume evaluates the advances that China has made in its aerospace operations and the implications of this advancement for U.S. naval strategy.”</p>
<p><strong>—Katherine Duke, “</strong><a title="Katherine Duke, “Chinese Aerospace Power: Evolving Maritime Roles,” “Short Takes,” Amherst Magazine (Fall 2011): 46." href="https://www.amherst.edu/share/1/361348" target="_blank"><strong>Chinese Aerospace Power: Evolving Maritime Roles</strong></a><strong>,” “Short Takes,” <em>Amherst Magazine</em> (Fall 2011): 46.</strong></p>
<p>“This enormously valuable and very up-to-date work… provides a very comprehensive analytical overview of the rapid development of the aerospace functions of the PLA Navy. Politicians, military officers, journalists, naval architects, ship-builders, ship-owners and even businessmen who have any connection with or concern for China would be well advised to buy and carefully study this book.”</p>
<p><strong>—<span><a title="Andrew S. Erickson and Lyle J. Goldstein, eds., Chinese Aerospace Power: Evolving Maritime Roles (Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press, 2011); review in Ausmarine (November 2011): 36." href="http://www.bairdmaritime.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=10661:chinese-aerospace-power-evolving-maritime-roles&amp;catid=51:modern-military&amp;Itemid=109&amp;q=chinese+aerospace+power" target="_blank"><em><span style="TEXT-DECORATION: none; text-underline: none">Ausmarine</span></em> (November 2011): 36</a>.</span></strong></p>
<p>“<em>offers a broad overview and appraisal of recent developments in Chinese aerospace and maritime power and examines implications for the US military, especially Chinese prowess in fielding advanced cruise missiles and China’s long-range precision-strike capabilities that pose a threat to forces in the Western Pacific theater….”</em><em> </em></p>
<p><strong>—<span><a title="Review of Chinese Aerospace Power by Book News Inc." href="http://www.booknews.com/ref_issues/ref_oct2011/naval1.html" target="_blank">“Reference &amp; Research Book News,” Book News Inc. (October 2011), 306</a>.</span></strong></p>
<p>“This volume has numerous strengths. Its greatest contribution to existing literature is that it uses a great deal of open source Chinese based literature to add credence to the authors ideas. &#8230;  The work assembles &#8230; an all-star cast of scholars to discuss one of the most timely security studies subjects of the 21st century. &#8230; When considered as a whole or in part, this work should give US strategic planners a moment of pause. Erickson and Goldstein have created a volume that is balanced, dense in scope but still readable and enjoyable. Combined with the assemblage of a ‘who’s who’ in Chinese security studies, the appeal of such a work is hard to deny. This volume should serve as the textbook to any security studies student who wishes to gain a scholarly perspective on China’s aerospace and military rise to power from a maritime perspective. It is a work I will keep close at hand for years to come.”<strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>—Harry Kazianis, “</strong><a title="Harry Kazianis, “Review: Chinese Aerospace Power, Evolving Maritime Roles,” 5 Stars, e-International Relations, 6 September 2011." onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.e-ir.info/?p=13643');" href="http://www.e-ir.info/?p=13643" target="_blank"><strong>Review: Chinese Aerospace Power, Evolving Maritime Roles</strong></a><strong>,” 5 Stars, <em>e-International Relations</em>, 6 September 2011.</strong></p>
<p>“… despite the numerous one-off articles, there hasn’t until now been a place in English that brings together all the pieces of the puzzle. That is until the recent publication by the China Maritime Studies Institute of <em>Chinese Aerospace Power: Evolving Maritime Roles</em>. The volume&#8230; offers a comprehensive overview of all the latest developments, and touches on the whole spectrum of the Chinese aerospace capabilities&#8230;. The essays, from some of the most highly regarded analysts in the field, help provide a good understanding of the state of Chinese aerospace modernization. The book not only examines the technical feasibility of Chinese plans, as well as their strengths and weaknesses, but also delves deep into domestic Chinese debates about the weapons systems in question. The volume manages to get to the core of the issue through open source analysis that compares and contrasts Chinese writings on the topic from a variety of official and unofficial sources, offering a far broader perspective than volumes focusing only on Western analysis. Indeed, <em>Chinese Aerospace Power</em> delves deeply into the Chinese system, examining inter-service rivalries and integration and training issues. … The book is a must-read piece for every government official involved with China-related issues, military or otherwise. If knowing your interlocutor is a prerequisite for successful negotiations, the book should be a big step towards providing a balanced and necessary understanding.”<strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>—Eleni Ekmektsioglou, “</strong><a title="Understanding China" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/the-diplomat.com/new-leaders-forum/2011/08/26/understanding-china/');" href="http://the-diplomat.com/new-leaders-forum/2011/08/26/understanding-china/"><strong>Understanding China</strong></a><strong>,” <em>The Diplomat</em>, 26 August 2011.</strong></p>
<p>“…this book was astonishing. …Almost everyone of the paper was informative (make that eye-opening)… Kudos to the authors and editor. But the heart of the book for a novice like myself was the realization of what the Chinese Second Artillery Corps has pulled off. Terminally guided precision Anti Ship Ballistic Missiles (ASBM) have essentially made our carriers obsolete for a war-time Taiwan mission in the Western Pacific. The PLAAF cruise missile, fighter and air defense systems are impressive. All of it feels like the Soviet reconnaissance/strike package implemented by a country that has its act together. This book should be required reading by every staffer in Washington.”</p>
<p><strong>—Tech Historian, “<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Chinese-Aerospace-Power-Evolving-Maritime/dp/1591142415/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1314644483&amp;sr=1-1" target="_blank">Outstanding! A Must Have on Your Shelf</a>,” 5 Star Rating,<em> Amazon.com</em>, 23 August 2011.</strong></p>
<p>“In the past, I have found works by Andrew Erickson, Lyle Goldstein and the good folks at China Maritime Studies Institute (CMSI) to be of the highest quality and this book was no exception. &#8230; It does a great job of understanding China’s motivations/intentions, while fairly examining PLA’s capabilities and training. For those seeking for a greater understanding of China’s air force, space development and Second Artillery Command, I think this is a must read. &#8230; On top of that, I was pleasantly surprised by all of the new information/analysis that I found in this book regarding China’s ASBM program. I have read many differently analyses on ASBM (including several by CMSI), but this book really provided a much more comprehensive look than anything else I have read. The discussions on subjects like conflict escalation of ASBM, hard kill vs soft kill and non-carrier targets were very refreshing. So, for all those who are interested in learning more about China’s Air Force, space development and Second Artillery, I think this book would be an excellent read.”<strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><strong><strong>—</strong></strong>Feng</strong><strong>, “</strong><a title="Feng, “Review of Chinese Aerospace Power: Evolving Maritime Roles,” Information Dissemination, 16 August 2011." href="http://www.informationdissemination.net/2011/08/review-of-chinese-aerospace-power.html" target="_blank"><strong>Review of Chinese Aerospace Power: Evolving Maritime Roles</strong></a><strong>,” <em>Information Dissemination</em>, 16 August 2011.</strong></p>
<p>“…the papers presented by this installation are of the highest quality with primary Chinese sources. They are written by the most respected authorities on the subject…. While unveiling fancy new equipment can generate headlines, the press generally doesn’t ask the deeper question of how new equipment may change existing PLA doctrine or examine potential implications. This is where the good folks from the CMSI come in and provide analyses that are lacking in the blogosphere….”<strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><strong>—</strong><a title="China Defense Blog, review of Andrew S. Erickson and Lyle J. Goldstein, eds., Chinese Aerospace Power: Evolving Maritime Roles (Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press, 2011), 31 July 2011." href="http://china-defense.blogspot.com/2011/07/cdf-book-review-chinese-aerospace-power.html" target="_blank">China Defense Blog</a>, </strong><strong>31 July 2011.</strong></p>
<p>“A useful analysis of Chinese air power, especially with regards to the sea. Balanced and highly technical, the book aims neither to hype nor downplay PLA capabilities.”</p>
<p><strong>—David Axe, “<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Chinese-Aerospace-Power-Evolving-Maritime/dp/1591142415/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1314644483&amp;sr=1-1" target="_blank">Useful Analysis</a>,” 4 Star Rating, <em>Amazon.com</em>, 28 July 2011.</strong></p>
<p>“&#8230;Beijing has a brutally simple—if risky—plan to compensate for [its] relative weakness: buy missiles. And then, buy more of them. All kinds of missiles: short-range and long-range; land-based, air-launched and sea-launched; ballistic and cruise; guided and ‘dumb.’ Those are the two striking themes that emerge from <em>Chinese Aerospace Power</em>&#8230;.”</p>
<p><strong>—David Axe, “</strong><a title="David Axe, “China’s Plan to Beat U.S.: Missiles, Missiles and More Missiles,” Danger Room, Wired.com, 27 July 2011." onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011/07/china-plan-to-beat-u-s/');" href="http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011/07/china-plan-to-beat-u-s/" target="_blank"><strong>China’s Plan to Beat U.S.: Missiles, Missiles and More Missiles</strong></a><strong>,” Danger Room, <em>Wired.com</em>, 27 July 2011.</strong></p>
<p><a title="Chinese Aerospace Power--Japanese Summary" href="http://www.andrewerickson.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Chinese-Aerospace-Power_Japanese-Summary_JANAFA.pdf" target="_blank"><strong>Japanese</strong></a><strong> summary translation now available: </strong><a title="Chinese Aerospace Power--Japanese Summary" href="http://www.andrewerickson.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Chinese-Aerospace-Power_Japanese-Summary_JANAFA.pdf" target="_blank"><strong>中国の航空宇宙パワー海洋任務への発展</strong></a><strong>.</strong></p>
<p>概　説</p>
<p>中国の空母計画は、一番艦が完成する前に大きな波紋を十分に齎しつつある。疑いなく、この開発は中国の国家安全保障政策に新しい時代の到来を告げるものだ。</p>
<p>一方、この本は、特定の質問に対して十分に新しい洞察力を示し、その焦点は、はっきりとより広い知的範囲にある。</p>
<p>中国の航空宇宙パワーは、以前には西洋の学問が未踏であった戦略的分野に焦点を置き、中国の航空宇宙開発の包括的な調査を試みている。</p>
<p>また本書は、これらの開発をアジア－太平洋地域における広大な海洋戦域にリンクさせ、米軍、特に米海軍に対する結果としての影響について強調している。<br />
著者について</p>
<p>アンドリュー・エリクソンとライル・Ｊ・ゴールドスタインは米国海軍大学の戦略研究部准教授であり、中国海洋研究所の発起人である。彼らは、「中国、米国及び21 世紀のシーパワー」及び「中国は海へ進出」を含む幾つかの書籍を共著している。<span id="_marker"> </span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.andrewerickson.com/2011/06/chinese-aerospace-power-evolving-maritime-roles-cmsi-vol-5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>China, the United States, and 21st Century Sea Power: Defining a Maritime Security Partnership (CMSI Vol. 4)</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewerickson.com/2010/12/china-the-united-states-and-21st-century-sea-power-defining-a-maritime-security-partnership/</link>
		<comments>http://www.andrewerickson.com/2010/12/china-the-united-states-and-21st-century-sea-power-defining-a-maritime-security-partnership/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 15:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andrewserickson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edited Volumes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewerickson.com/?p=1699</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Andrew S. Erickson, Lyle J. Goldstein, and Nan Li, eds., China, the United States, and 21st Century Sea Power: Defining a Maritime Security Partnership (Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press, 2010).
A Proceedings Magazine 2010 Notable Naval Book
Author of “The Container Security Initiative and U.S.-China Relations,” pp. 59-100;
“Prospects for Sino-U.S. Naval Cooperation against Avian Influenza,” pp. 326-52;
and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew S. Erickson, Lyle J. Goldstein, and Nan Li, eds., <a title="China, the United States, and 21st Century Sea Power: Defining a Maritime Security Partnership" href="http://www.amazon.com/China-United-States-21st-Century-Power/dp/1591142431/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1277254828&amp;sr=1-1" target="_blank"><strong><em>China, the United States, and 21st Century Sea Power: Defining a Maritime Security Partnership</em></strong></a> (Annapolis, MD: <a title="China, the United States, and 21st Century Sea Power: Defining a Maritime Security Partnership" href="http://www.usni.org/store/item.asp?ITEM_ID=1916" target="_blank">Naval Institute Press</a>, 2010).</p>
<p><strong><a title="Lt. Cdr. Thomas J. Cutler, USN (Ret.), “Notable Naval Books of 2010,” U.S. Naval Institute Proceedings 137:5 (May 2011): 64-69." href="http://www.andrewerickson.com/2011/05/china-the-united-states-and-21st-century-sea-power-selected-for-proceedings%e2%80%99-%e2%80%9cnotable-naval-books-of-2010%e2%80%9d/" target="_blank">A <em>Proceedings</em> Magazine 2010 Notable Naval Book</a></strong></p>
<p>Author of “The Container Security Initiative and U.S.-China Relations,” pp. 59-100;</p>
<p>“Prospects for Sino-U.S. Naval Cooperation against Avian Influenza,” pp. 326-52;</p>
<p>and “Chinese Views of America’s New Maritime Strategy,” pp. 429-70.</p>
<p>Coauthor, with Lyle Goldstein, of “Introduction: In the Same Boat Together,” pp. ix-xxix.</p>
<p><a title="China, the United States, and 21st Century Sea Power: Defining a Maritime Security Partnership Table of Contents" href="http://www.andrewerickson.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/China-Maritime-Security-Partnership_Table-of-Contents.pdf" target="_blank"><strong>TABLE OF CONTENTS</strong></a></p>
<p><em>China’s rise on the world’s oceans is attracting wide attention and may ultimately restructure the global balance of power during the course of the 21st century. Many books have described this phenomenon and the significant strategic implications that flow from Beijing’s rapid maritime development. However, the subject of whether and how to potentially integrate a stronger China into a global maritime security partnership has not been adequately explored. Delving into a variety of vital domains of contemporary maritime security, American and Chinese contributors to this edited volume illustrate that despite recent turbulence in U.S.-China military relations, substantial shared interests should enable extensive maritime security cooperation. But for professionals to structure cooperation effectively, they warn, Washington and Beijing must create sufficient political and institutional space.</em></p>
<p><em>This is the fourth book in the series “Studies in Chinese Maritime Development” published jointly by the China Maritime Studies Institute and the Naval Institute Press.</em></p>
<p><strong>BLURBS</strong></p>
<p>“At a time when many are talking about a possible China-U.S. naval conflict as part of their strategic rivalry, this path-breaking volume offers an alternative approach. The authors present a blueprint for pursuing shared U.S.-China interests and cooperation in the maritime domain. It is a must-read for practitioners and strategists alike who wish to see a new partnership between the two maritime giants.”</p>
<p><strong>&#8211;Prof. Wang Jisi, Dean, School of International Studies, Peking University</strong></p>
<p>“If you think the U.S.-China relationship is the foremost of our bilateral relationships, and if issues on the seas of East Asia give you pause, then this book is for you. Events give it timeliness; the exceptional quality and depth of research give it permanence. This comprehensive set of thoughts, background, and actionable recommendations belongs on the desk of military and diplomatic decision-makers, as well as scholars of the U.S.-China way ahead.”</p>
<p><strong>&#8211;Admiral Joseph W. Prueher, USN (Ret.), Former Commander-in-Chief, U.S. Pacific Command, and Ambassador to China</strong></p>
<p>“In the maritime strategic tensions more prominent than before between China and the United States, this excellently edited collection is essential because it focuses on the hopeful maritime security partnership between them. It is definitely among the few best books on this topic, a topic with enormous implications for the security and prosperity of the 21<sup>st</sup>-century world.”</p>
<p><strong>&#8211;Dr. Shi Yinhong, Professor of International Relations and Strategy, and Director, Center for American Studies, Renmin University of China</strong></p>
<p>“The opportunities and challenges confronting the United States and China in the maritime domain in the years ahead are of great importance to those two countries and to the entire Asia-Pacific region. Thoughtful examination and analysis of those opportunities and challenges, as done in this publication, will provide a critical foundation for decision-makers as they address stability and security issues for the United States and China.”</p>
<p><strong>&#8211;Admiral Timothy J. Keating, USN (Ret.), Former Commander-in-Chief, U.S. Pacific Command</strong></p>
<p>“A timely, penetrating analysis of the transformation of contemporary power relations at sea. Chinese and American maritime interests are destined to affect their relations, and hence their cooperative partnership is of vital importance to a rule-binding security order in the world.”</p>
<p><strong>&#8211;Dr. Shen Dingli, Executive Dean, Institute of International Studies, and Director, Center for American Studies, Fudan University</strong></p>
<p><strong>REVIEWS</strong></p>
<p>“An oft-heard refrain from international relations specialists, as well as within Track II fora, is that maritime confidence-building measures and maritime cooperation are necessary to lessen tensions. Indeed they are, but the difficulty is moving from the “general” exhortation for cooperation to the “specific” practicalities of what is achievable. And that is the main utility of this book—it is written by practitioners who discuss issues and proffer options that can be used.”</p>
<p><strong><strong><strong>–</strong></strong>Andrew Forbes, “</strong><a title="Andrew Forbes, “China and Sea Power in the Twenty-First Century,” International Journal of Maritime History 23.1 (June 2011): 341-46." onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.mun.ca/mhp/June-2011.htm');" href="http://www.mun.ca/mhp/June-2011.htm" target="_blank"><strong>China and Sea Power in the Twenty-First Century</strong></a><strong>,” <em>International Journal of Maritime History </em>23.1 (June 2011): 341-46.</strong></p>
<p>“The US Naval Institute Press has, along with the China Maritime Studies Institute at the US Naval War College, published key studies on PRC maritime developments. … The new book by the two institutes, <em>China, the United States and 21st Century</em><em> Sea Power: Defining a Maritime Security Partnership</em>, takes understanding of the PRC’s maritime ambitions to the next level.”</p>
<p><strong><strong>–</strong>Gregory R. Copley, “</strong><a title="“Focus on PLA(N),” Essential Reading: Important New Strategic Literature, Defense &amp; Foreign Affairs Strategic Policy 4 (2011): 16." href="http://www.strategicstudies.org/" target="_blank"><strong>Focus on PLA(N)</strong></a><strong>,” Essential Reading: Important New Strategic Literature, <em>Defense &amp; Foreign Affairs Strategic Policy</em> 4 (2011): 16.</strong></p>
<p>“Chinese sea power is very much a concern of U.S. naval strategists and factors in the deliberations of the United States as it attempts to balance its force structure to fight and win high-intensity wars as well as low intensity conflicts. … The[se] papers explore the issue of integrating China into a global maritime security partnership.”</p>
<p><strong>–Richard R. Burgess, Managing Editor, “</strong><a title="Seapower Magazine" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.navyleague.org/sea_power/');" href="http://www.navyleague.org/sea_power/" target="_blank"><strong>Books Detail Chinese Naval Strategy</strong></a><strong>,” <em>Seapower</em> 54.7 (July 2011), 49.</strong></p>
<p>“Each year there is one book that stands out from the pack. <em>China, the United States and 21st Century Sea Power</em>… needs to be read by every member of the Australian Naval Institute, not only because it provides a blue-print for naval policy in the Asia-Pacific Century but also because it is one of the few authoritative works that discusses a cooperative alternative to the sensationalist threat driven responses to the rise of China.  …a positive, balanced, thought provoking, and timely study which will no doubt impact upon the relationship between China and the United States over the next twenty years. … This book is highly recommended.”</p>
<p><strong>–<a title="China, the United States, and 21st Century Sea Power Praised by Dr. Gregory Gilbert in Headmark: Journal of the Australian Naval Institute" href="http://www.andrewerickson.com/2011/05/china-the-united-states-and-21st-century-sea-power-praised-by-dr-gregory-gilbert-in-headmark-journal-of-the-australian-naval-institute/" target="_blank">Gregory P. Gilbert, Air Power Development Centre</a>, <em>Headmark: Journal of the Australian Naval Institute (</em>May 2011).</strong></p>
<p>“The essays, written by experts on both sides of the Pacific, present varied views typical of the spirit of academic freedom that prevails at the Naval War College (despite its governmental sponsorship) and serves as the bedrock of the Naval Institute’s long-respected open forum.”</p>
<p><strong>–</strong><strong>Lt. Cdr. Thomas J. Cutler, USN (Ret.), </strong><strong>“<a title="Lt. Cdr. Thomas J. Cutler, USN (Ret.), “Notable Naval Books of 2010,” U.S. Naval Institute Proceedings 137:5 (May 2011): 64-69." href="http://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2011-05/notable-naval-books-2010" target="_blank"><strong>Notable Naval Books of 2010</strong></a>,” </strong><strong>U.S. Naval Institute <em>Proceedings</em> 137:5 (May 2011): 64-69.</strong><strong></strong></p>
<p>“a fine and very highly recommended read, not to be missed.”</p>
<p><strong>–“<a title="“The Military Shelf,” Wisconsin Book Watch, Midwest Book Review, 6.2 (February 2011)." href="http://www.midwestbookreview.com/wbw/feb_11.htm" target="_blank">The Military Shelf</a>,” Wisconsin Book Watch, <em>Midwest Book Review</em>, 6.2 (February 2011).</strong></p>
<p>“This volume presents an analysis of how the United States’ new maritime strategy will affect the international system, and particularly how it will affect relations with China. It argues that extensive US–China maritime-security cooperation is both possible and desirable.”</p>
<p><strong>–“Brief Notices: Asia-Pacific,” <em><a title="“Brief Notices: Asia-Pacific,” Survival, 53.1 (February–March 2011): 199-200." href="http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/00396338.asp" target="_blank">Survival</a></em>, 53.1 (February–March 2011): 199-200.</strong></p>
<p>“The attempt by the good folks at the US Naval War College should be applauded – the impact of this important work will move from academia to shape the policy between two great nations and half the world.”</p>
<p><strong><strong>–</strong>Xinhui, </strong><strong><em><a title="Xinhui, “Book Review: ‘China, the United States and 21st Century Sea Power: Defining a Maritime Security Partnership,’ China Defense Blog, 5 January 2011." href="http://china-defense.blogspot.com/2011/01/book-review-china-united-states-and.html" target="_blank">China Defense Blog</a></em>, 5 January 2011<span>.</span></strong></p>
<p><strong><span>MEDIA</span></strong></p>
<p style="margin-top: 18px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 18px; margin-left: 0px; outline-width: 0px; outline-style: initial; outline-color: initial; font-size: 14px; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial; padding: 0px; border: 0px initial initial;">Andrew S. Erickson, <strong>“</strong><strong><a style="outline-width: 0px; outline-style: initial; outline-color: initial; font-size: 14px; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; text-decoration: none; color: #4b729b; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial; padding: 0px; margin: 0px; border: 0px initial initial;" title="Andrew S. Erickson, “China, the United States, and 21st-Century Sea Power,” Interview on John Batchelor Show, 77 WABC Radio New York, 5 February 2011." href="http://wabcradio.com/FlashPlayer/default.asp?SPID=33447&amp;ID=2102194" target="_blank">China, the United States, and 21st-Century Sea Power</a>,”</strong> Interview on <a style="outline-width: 0px; outline-style: initial; outline-color: initial; font-size: 14px; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; text-decoration: none; color: #4b729b; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial; padding: 0px; margin: 0px; border: 0px initial initial;" title="Andrew S. Erickson, “China, the United States, and 21st-Century Sea Power,” Interview on John Batchelor Show, 77 WABC Radio New York, 5 February 2011." href="http://wabcradio.com/sectional.asp?id=33447" target="_blank">John Batchelor Show, 77 WABC Radio New York</a>, 5 February 2011.</p>
<p style="margin-top: 18px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 18px; margin-left: 0px; outline-width: 0px; outline-style: initial; outline-color: initial; font-size: 14px; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial; padding: 0px; border: 0px initial initial;"><em><a style="outline-width: 0px; outline-style: initial; outline-color: initial; font-size: 14px; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; text-decoration: none; color: #4b729b; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial; padding: 0px; margin: 0px; border: 0px initial initial;" title="Andrew S. Erickson, “China, the United States, and 21st-Century Sea Power,” Interview on John Batchelor Show, 77 WABC Radio New York, 5 February 2011." href="http://wabcradio.com/FlashPlayer/default.asp?SPID=33447&amp;ID=2102194" target="_blank">Go to section 18:13-34:44 of the podcast to hear the interview</a>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.andrewerickson.com/2010/12/china-the-united-states-and-21st-century-sea-power-defining-a-maritime-security-partnership/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>China Goes to Sea: Maritime Transformation in Comparative Historical Perspective (CMSI Vol. 3)</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewerickson.com/2009/07/china-goes-to-sea-maritime-transformation-in-comparative-historical-perspective/</link>
		<comments>http://www.andrewerickson.com/2009/07/china-goes-to-sea-maritime-transformation-in-comparative-historical-perspective/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 01:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andrewserickson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edited Volumes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japanese Language 日本語]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewserickson.wordpress.com/?p=182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Andrew S. Erickson, Lyle J. Goldstein, and Carnes Lord, eds., China Goes to Sea: Maritime Transformation in Comparative Historical Perspective (Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press, July 2009).
Japanese language summary translations now available: “書籍2:中国は海へ進出–歴史的経緯の比較による海洋の変革”and “大陸国家が海洋を目指す時.”
Coauthor, with Lyle Goldstein, of “Chinese Perspectives on Maritime Transformation,” pp. xiii-xxxvi;
and “China Studies the Rise of Great Powers,” pp. 401-25. Required [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew S. Erickson, Lyle J. Goldstein, and Carnes Lord, eds., <a title="China Goes to Sea--USNI Webpage" href="http://www.usni.org/store/item.asp?ITEM_ID=1789&amp;DEPARTMENT_ID=135" target="_blank"><strong><em>China Goes to Sea: Maritime Transformation in Comparative Historical Perspective</em></strong></a> (Annapolis, MD: <a title="China Goest to Sea--Book News" href="http://andrewserickson.files.wordpress.com/2009/08/china-goes-to-sea_information.pdf" target="_blank">Naval Institute Press</a>, July 2009).</p>
<p><a title="“When Land Powers Look Seaward”—Japanese Translation" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.andrewerickson.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/When-Land-Powers-Look-Seaward_Proceedings_201104_Japanese.pdf');" href="http://www.andrewerickson.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/When-Land-Powers-Look-Seaward_Proceedings_201104_Japanese.pdf" target="_blank">Japanese</a> language summary translations now available: “<a title="“書籍2:中国は海へ進出--歴史的経緯の比較による海洋の変革” [Book 2: China Goes to Sea: Maritime Transformation in Comparative Historical Perspective], p. 28." onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.janafa.com/book-38/page-28.pdf');" href="http://www.janafa.com/book-38/page-28.pdf" target="_blank">書籍2:中国は海へ進出–歴史的経緯の比較による海洋の変革</a>”and “<a title="“When Land Powers Look Seaward”—Japanese Translation" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.andrewerickson.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/When-Land-Powers-Look-Seaward_Proceedings_201104_Japanese.pdf');" href="http://www.andrewerickson.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/When-Land-Powers-Look-Seaward_Proceedings_201104_Japanese.pdf" target="_blank">大陸国家が海洋を目指す時</a>.”</p>
<p>Coauthor, with Lyle Goldstein, of “Chinese Perspectives on Maritime Transformation,” pp. xiii-xxxvi;</p>
<p>and “China Studies the Rise of Great Powers,” pp. 401-25. Required reading for the Naval War College <a title="Naval War College Strategy and Policy Department" href="http://www.usnwc.edu/Departments---Colleges/Strategy-and-Policy.aspx" target="_blank">Strategy and Policy Department</a>’s Senior Leadership Course.</p>
<p><strong><a title="Table of Contents for China Goes to Sea" href="http://www.andrewerickson.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/China-Goes-to-Sea_Table-of-Contents.pdf" target="_blank">TABLE OF CONTENTS</a></strong></p>
<p><span id="1591142423_vVsYFLeuXz_commentText"><em>China</em></span><em>’</em><span id="1591142423_vVsYFLeuXz_commentText"><em>s turn toward the sea is evident in its stunning rise in global shipbuilding markets, its expanding merchant marine, its wide reach of offshore energy exploration, its growing fishing fleet, and its increasingly modern navy. Unlike other works that view China in isolation, this comprehensive assessment of China</em></span><em>’</em><span id="1591142423_vVsYFLeuXz_commentText"><em>s potential as a genuine maritime power places China in a larger world historical context. The authors, all authorities on their respective historical eras, examine cases of attempted maritime transformation through the ages, from the Persian Empire to the Soviet Union, and determine the reasons for success or failure. Without underestimating the enduring pull of China</em></span><em>’</em><span id="1591142423_vVsYFLeuXz_commentText"><em>s past as it embodies threats to the country</em></span><em>’</em><span id="1591142423_vVsYFLeuXz_commentText"><em>s internal stability and its landward borders, this comparative study provides reasons to believe&#8211;despite continued skepticism&#8211;that China has turned the corner on maritime transformation. If this proves to be true, the authors contend, such a transformation would be an extraordinary event in the history of the last two millennia. Their work updates other books written on the subject that have been overtaken by China</em></span><em>’</em><span id="1591142423_vVsYFLeuXz_commentText"><em>s rapid strategic and technological change. Readers will especially appreciate the book</em></span><em>’</em><span id="1591142423_vVsYFLeuXz_commentText"><em>s detailed maps and forward-looking analytical framework for understanding the future of Asian maritime power. </em></span></p>
<p><span><strong>BLURBS (<a title="China Goes to Sea--Blurbs--Full-Length" href="http://www.andrewerickson.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/China-Goes-to-Sea_Blurbs_Full-Length.pdf" target="_blank">FULL-LENGTH</a>)</strong><br />
</span></p>
<p>“<span id="1591142423_vVsYFLeuXz_commentText">Throughout Asia today, China dominates the conversation</span>.<span id="1591142423_vVsYFLeuXz_commentText"> </span>&#8230;<span id="1591142423_vVsYFLeuXz_commentText">This valuable new book&#8230; provides in one volume a comprehensive assessment of China</span>’<span id="1591142423_vVsYFLeuXz_commentText">s naval development, the principal historical precedents, and the complex thought process that guides the Chinese Navy</span>’<span id="1591142423_vVsYFLeuXz_commentText">s leadership.</span>”</p>
<p><span id="1591142423_vVsYFLeuXz_commentText"><strong>&#8211;Admiral Walter F. Doran, USN (Ret.), former Commander, U.S. Pacific Fleet </strong></span></p>
<p>“<span id="1591142423_vVsYFLeuXz_commentText">The maritime history of China has long been a neglected field. The absorbing interpretive essays in China goes to Sea bring that knowledge-gap to an end&#8230;. This volume will be an indispensable companion to those readers seeking to understand where China</span>’<span id="1591142423_vVsYFLeuXz_commentText">s navy may be heading.</span>”</p>
<p><span id="1591142423_vVsYFLeuXz_commentText"><strong>&#8211;Jonathan Spence, Yale University, author of <em>Treason by the Book</em> and <em>The Search for Modern China </em></strong></span></p>
<p>“<span id="1591142423_vVsYFLeuXz_commentText">&#8230;a veritable feast of delights. It shows how important Chinese maritime power is likely to be for the rest of us, but also how complex that issue actually is. It identifies so many lessons, and it establishes the dangers, limits and opportunities so well that we must hope that Chinese policy-makers also read this deeply authoritative book closely, for their sake, as well as for ours.</span>”</p>
<p><span id="1591142423_vVsYFLeuXz_commentText"><strong>&#8211;Geoffrey Till, Corbett Centre for Maritime Policy Studies, UK, author of <em>Seapower: A Guide for the 21st Century</em></strong></span></p>
<p>“<span id="1591142423_vVsYFLeuXz_commentText">This is an original and well-designed collection of scholarly essays on the larger historical context of China&#8217;s current maritime growth. &#8230; an important read.</span>”</p>
<p><span id="1591142423_vVsYFLeuXz_commentText"><strong>&#8211;Paul Kennedy, Yale University, author of <em>The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers</em></strong></span></p>
<p>“<span id="1591142423_vVsYFLeuXz_commentText">This book deserves to be read by every career Navy and Marine officer and then retained on his/her bookshelf.</span>”</p>
<p><span id="1591142423_vVsYFLeuXz_commentText"><strong>&#8211;Rear Admiral Ronald J. Kurth, USN (Ret.) </strong></span></p>
<p>“<span id="1591142423_vVsYFLeuXz_commentText"><em>&#8230;</em>a remarkable collection of essays by a group of outstanding scholars. &#8230; Current developments make it essential reading for students of China, strategy, and international relations.</span>”</p>
<p><span id="1591142423_vVsYFLeuXz_commentText"><strong>&#8211;Donald Kagan, Yale University, author of <em>On the Origins of War</em> and <em>The Peloponnesian War </em></strong></span></p>
<p>“<span id="1591142423_vVsYFLeuXz_commentText">Among its many other merits, it provides a valuable window into what the Chinese themselves are thinking about strategic maritime matters.</span>”</p>
<p><span id="1591142423_vVsYFLeuXz_commentText"><strong>&#8211;John Curtis Perry, The Fletcher School of Law &amp; Diplomacy, Tufts University </strong></span></p>
<p>“<span id="1591142423_vVsYFLeuXz_commentText">&#8230;a major contribution to the development of a comparative and historical perspective on contemporary China</span>’<span id="1591142423_vVsYFLeuXz_commentText">s growing maritime ambitions. &#8230;essential reading for scholars and policy makers concerned about Chinese defense policy and developments in Chinese maritime policy.</span>”</p>
<p><strong><span id="1591142423_vVsYFLeuXz_commentText">&#8211;Robert S. Ross, Professor of Political Science, Boston College</span></strong></p>
<p><span><strong>REVIEWS</strong></span></p>
<p>“This book is a wonderful academic review not just of China’s maritime power but of the history of sea command. The editors do a remarkable job of building a comprehensive picture of where China stands today in its pursuit of maritime capability to match its economic ascendency and continental military power. …In answering why China needs a maritime power projection capability, this book clearly illustrates the links among economics, national security, and strategic ambition. All too often the naval lobby forgets to link these factors. Perhaps this lesson should be allowed to reverberate around Western corridors of power, next time the naval lobby comes second in the debate over the division of meager defence resources. … The introduction poses a list of 10 key questions. These questions are so pertinent they should be given to those charged with generating maritime strategy. These 10 simple questions illuminate the issue of strategy generation with clarity and vision. I would commend them to any student or serving officer when looking for a justification of the importance of maritime strategy within the realm of national security. The first part of the book is devoted to pre-modern era maritime states, charting collectively the rise of Persia, Sparta, Rome and the Ottoman Turks. This succinct comparative review would serve as an excellent introduction to any student of naval power in the ancient world. The authors bring a fresh perspective to events that have traditionally caused narcolepsy to students. …”</p>
<p><strong><strong>&#8211;</strong>Dave Mugridge, <em><a title="Dave Mugridge, review of Andrew S. Erickson, Lyle J. Goldstein, and Carnes Lord, eds., China Goes to Sea: Maritime Transformation in Comparative Historical Perspective (Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press, July 2009) in Canadian Naval Review, 7.2 (Summer 2011): 42-43." href="http://naval.review.cfps.dal.ca/archive/tocv7n2.php" target="_blank">Canadian Naval Review</a></em>, 7.2 (Summer 2011): 42-43.</strong></p>
<p>“The US Naval Institute Press has, along with the China Maritime Studies Institute at the US Naval War College, published key studies on PRC maritime developments. Their July 2009 study, <em>China Goes to Sea</em>, was seminal.”</p>
<p><strong>&#8211;Gregory R. Copley, “</strong><a title="“Focus on PLA(N),” Essential Reading: Important New Strategic Literature, Defense &amp; Foreign Affairs Strategic Policy 4 (2011): 16." href="http://www.strategicstudies.org/" target="_blank"><strong>Focus on PLA(N)</strong></a><strong>,” Essential Reading: Important New Strategic Literature, <em>Defense &amp; Foreign Affairs Strategic Policy</em> 4 (2011): 16.</strong></p>
<p>“This book is not just for China experts; it is for all those readers interested in the development of sea power at its most basic &#8211; that is, how did a number of states develop and use their navies, why did some keep them and others discard them?”</p>
<p><strong>&#8211;Andrew Forbes <strong style="outline-width: 0px; outline-style: initial; outline-color: initial; font-size: 14px; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial; padding: 0px; margin: 0px; border: 0px initial initial;">in </strong><strong style="outline-width: 0px; outline-style: initial; outline-color: initial; font-size: 14px; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial; padding: 0px; margin: 0px; border: 0px initial initial;"><em style="outline-width: 0px; outline-style: initial; outline-color: initial; font-size: 14px; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial; padding: 0px; margin: 0px; border: 0px initial initial;"><a style="outline-width: 0px; outline-style: initial; outline-color: initial; font-size: 14px; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; text-decoration: none; color: #4b729b; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial; padding: 0px; margin: 0px; border: 0px initial initial;" title="The Northern Mariner 20 (2010)" href="http://www.cnrs-scrn.org/northern_mariner/index_vol_20.html" target="_blank">The Northern Mariner</a> </em></strong><strong style="outline-width: 0px; outline-style: initial; outline-color: initial; font-size: 14px; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial; padding: 0px; margin: 0px; border: 0px initial initial;">20 </strong>(2010), 430-31.</strong></p>
<p>“the breadth and quality of the various contributions mean that it has relevance to a much more extensive readership than the dedicated follower of Chinese naval strategy. … A particularly interesting chapter contributed by Messrs Erickson and Goldstein analyses the findings of the Chinese government’s own recent study entitled <em>The Rise of Great Powers</em>. … many strands are drawn together in Carnes Lord’s concluding chapter. This provides both a clear summing up of the many hurdles land-based powers face when they embark on a maritime transformation, and a well-reasoned assessment of the point China has reached in its own voyage to the sea.”</p>
<p><strong>&#8211;Conrad Waters, author, <em>Seaforth World Naval Review 2012</em>; </strong><strong>in “Naval Books of the Year,” John Jordan and Stephen Dent, eds., <em><a style="outline-width: 0px; outline-style: initial; outline-color: initial; font-size: 14px; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; text-decoration: none; color: #4b729b; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial; padding: 0px; margin: 0px; border: 0px initial initial;" title="John Jordan and Stephen Dent, eds., Warship 2011 (Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press, June 2011)." href="http://www.usni.org/store/books/ship-reference/warship-2011" target="_blank">Warship 2011</a></em> (Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press, June 2011), 184-85.</strong></p>
<p>“<em>China Goes to Sea</em> is to be welcomed for all the right scholarly reasons and its contributors are to be congratulated for shedding further light on the fascinating yet manifestly unfinished story of China’s maritime transformation.”</p>
<p><strong>&#8211;Malcolm H. Murfett, National University of Singapore, </strong><strong><a title="International Journal of Maritime History, Vol. 22, No. 1 (June 2010)" href="http://www.mun.ca/mhp/June-2010.htm" target="_blank"><em>International Journal of Maritime History</em>, Vol. 22, No. 1<em> </em>(June 2010), pp. 384-86</a>.</strong></p>
<p>“The excellent idea behind this collection is the historical comparison of how other powers in other times have made the transition from land to sea power. … In addition to its portraits and perceptions of Chinese naval expansion, the book has fine introductions to more obscure topics, such as the Ottomans. …Especially for policy makers. Summing up: Highly recommended. Most levels/libraries.”</p>
<p><strong>&#8211;R. Higham, emeritus, Kansas State University, <a title="R. Higham Review of China Goes to Sea in Choice" href="http://www.cro2.org/" target="_blank"><em>Choice: Current Reviews for Academic Libraries</em></a>, Vol. 47, No. 9 (May 2010).</strong></p>
<p>“&#8230;important not only for those working in naval studies and for sinologists, but also for scholars concerned with the idea of strategic culture and its application.”</p>
<p><strong>&#8211;Jeremy Black, University of Exeter, <a title="China Goes to Sea--Review by Jeremy Black in Naval War College Review" href="http://www.usnwc.edu/getattachment/465ca4ab-af35-44af-9c70-269333c48907/Book-Reviews" target="_blank"><em>Naval War College Review</em>, Vol. 63, No. 3 (Summer 2010), pp. 156-57</a>.</strong></p>
<p>“This is a vital book that ought to be read by all the world’s political leaders and their advisors, senior military personnel and pro-active business people. Not only does it, as it claims, put China’s maritime transformation into historical perspective, it puts almost all maritime commerce into historical perspective. In analysing China’s current situation, it provides a brilliant overview of global commercial history.”</p>
<p><strong><em>&#8211;</em><a title="China Goes to Sea--Review in Ships &amp; Shipping" href="http://www.bairdmaritime.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=2866:china-goes-to-sea-maritime-transformation-in-comparative-historical-perspective&amp;catid=50:history&amp;Itemid=108" target="_blank"><em>Ships and Shipping</em></a> (March 2010), p. 37.</strong></p>
<p>“…The last two parts of the book look just at China. They consist of three particularly stimulating chapters which look at the rise and fall of Chinese seapower in the past and four which explore possible trajectories into the future. What emerges is a picture of the Chinese pragmatically transforming themselves (back?) into a sea-faring nation …an excellent book which sparks ideas about a lot more than ‘just’ the maritime transformation of China.”</p>
<p><strong>&#8211;<a title="Anonymous Review of China Goes to Sea" href="http://www.andrewerickson.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/China-Goes-to-Sea_Review_2010-02-10.pdf" target="_blank">Anonymous reviewer</a>, 10 February 2010.</strong></p>
<p>“The third book in the Studies in Chinese Maritime Development series, this volume includes maps and essays on the nation’s seagoing endeavors from ancient times to the present.”</p>
<p><strong>&#8211;Katherine Duke, “Short Takes,” <em><a title="Amherst Magazine Short Takes" href="https://www.amherst.edu/aboutamherst/magazine/issues/2010winter/amherstcreates/shorttakes" target="_blank">Amherst Magazine</a></em>, Winter 2010.</strong><strong></strong></p>
<p>“Placing China’s efforts to expand its maritime power in historical context, the authors contend that the country may finally be on the verge of transforming itself from a strictly continental to a maritime power.”</p>
<p><strong>&#8211;<a title="China Goes to Sea--Survival" href="http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/tsur" target="_blank"><em>Survival</em></a>, Vol. 52, No. 1 (February-March 2010), p. 229.</strong></p>
<p>“compares historical examples dating from the Persian Empire’s maritime transformation in 550-490 BC to China’s ongoing metamorphosis, expertly addressing the factors influencing China’s turn to the sea. … This volume includes excellent work… highlighting a number of ways in which China appears to be deviating from the path historical precedence would seem to dictate. …evidence that China’s path may not replicate historical examples is offered by Erickson and Goldstein, who provide an excellent overview of how Beijing has studied the rise of great powers in hopes of emulating successes and avoiding pitfalls. Carnes Lord reviews the factors that led to failed maritime transformations and finds no compelling reason that China’s turn to the sea will fail. Instead, he finds a country that has accurately identified its geostrategic vulnerability to seaward attack and has adjusted its maritime policies to these changing security requirements. Lord’s only question is the pace and degree of China’s maritime transformation.”</p>
<p><strong>&#8211;Scott W. Bray (the U.S. Navy’s Senior Intelligence Officer for China), </strong><strong>“<a title="Review of CMSI Vols. 1-3 in Asia Policy" href="http://www.nbr.org/publications/asia_policy/ap9/AP9_I_CMSIBRE.pdf" target="_blank">Turning to the Sea… This Time to Stay</a>,” Book Review Essay, <em>Asia Policy</em>, No. 9 (January 2010), pp. 167-72.</strong></p>
<p>“should be required reading for anyone interested in either China or, more broadly, maritime strategy. … Whether China is able to achieve what few nations in the past have done and transform itself from a continentalist past to a maritime future is an issue that will continue to be addressed for years to come. … This book is an extremely valuable contribution to that debate.”</p>
<p><strong>&#8211;Capt. Gordon Andrew, RAN, <em><a title="China Goes to Sea--Australian Defence Force Journal Review" href="http://www.adfjournal.adc.edu.au/site/" target="_blank">Australian Defence Force Journal</a></em> (Issue No. 180, 2009), pp. 85-86.</strong></p>
<p>“Comprising a collection of essays from 17 clear headed and far sighted scholars it succinctly analyses present day China and its position in the maritime world, indeed in the whole world. This is one of those rare books that delivers vastly more than it promises. A fine piece of literary jewellery full of smaller gems.”</p>
<p><strong>&#8211;<em><a title="China Goes to Sea--Baird Maritime Book Review" href="http://www.bairdmaritime.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=2866:china-goes-to-sea-maritime-transformation-in-comparative-historical-perspective&amp;catid=50:history&amp;Itemid=108&amp;q=erickson" target="_blank">Baird Maritime</a></em>, 10 August 2009.</strong></p>
<p>“&#8230;an impressive study with a sophisticated and comparative approach, a worthy addition to any library. It is an informative read that will please history-buffs and political-wonks alike.”</p>
<p><strong>&#8211;Xinhui, <em><a title="China Goes to Sea--China Defense Blog Review" href="http://china-defense.blogspot.com/2009/08/china-goes-to-sea-maritime.html" target="_blank">China Defense Blog</a></em>, 4 August 2009.</strong></p>
<p><strong>ENGLISH &amp; JAPANESE SUMMARIES OF BOOK:</strong></p>
<div>
<div>
<p>Andrew Erickson, Lyle Goldstein, and Carnes Lord, <strong>“<a title="Andrew Erickson, Lyle Goldstein, and Carnes Lord, “When Land Powers Look Seaward,” U.S. Naval Institute Proceedings, 137.4 (April 2011)." onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2011-04/when-land-powers-look-seaward');" href="http://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2011-04/when-land-powers-look-seaward" target="_blank">When Land Powers Look Seaward</a>,”</strong> U.S. Naval Institute <em>Proceedings</em>, 137.4 (April 2011): 18-23.</p>
<p><em><a title="“When Land Powers Look Seaward”—Proceedings" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2011-04/when-land-powers-look-seaward');" href="http://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2011-04/when-land-powers-look-seaward" target="_blank">How does a traditional land power like China make the transformation to major maritime player? Andrew Erickson, Lyle Goldstein, and Carnes Lord of the Naval War College suggest that China can draw lessons from the past. They point out that the Persians, Napoleonic France, and Imperial Germany all attempted to become sea powers. What can China learn from their experiences?</a></em></p>
<p><em>A continental-to-maritime transformation has been attempted frequently through the ages, but only rarely with success. The past offers lessons to a navally expanding China.</em></p>
<p><em>As European naval powers decline rapidly and the U.S. Navy diminishes quantitatively, China is going to sea. This ends a great historical trend that began six centuries ago, in which China withdrew inward and European naval expansion spread Western influence worldwide.</em></p>
<p><em>Now, for the first time in history, a robust and enduring debate pervades Beijing: Is China a continental power, a maritime power, or both? To what extent will its persisting political and strategic geography and the continentalist strategic culture it helped to form constrain its development as a maritime power? …</em></p>
<p><strong>Proceedings 4 月号　中国特集からの論文紹介</strong></p>
<p><strong>米海軍協会（Naval Institute）の機関誌プロシーディングス（Proceedings）の2011 年4 月号は、中国に焦点を置いた論文を掲載している。その中で特にユニークで興味深い次の論文２題を紹介する。</strong></p>
<p>大陸国家が海洋を目指す時<br />
　アンドリュー・エリクソン（Andrew Erickson）<br />
　ライル・ゴールドスタイン（Lyle Goldstein）<br />
　カーンズ・ロード（Carnes Lord）</p>
<p>これらの論文は、個人的な見解に基づくものであるが、著者は何れも米海軍大学に所属する新進気鋭の教授達であり、米海軍戦略のシンクタンクを担っていると目される。（編集部記）</p>
<p>要　旨</p>
<p>この論文は、中国のような伝統的大陸国家が、如何にして海洋国家への転換を果し得るかということをテーマとしている。そしてその論旨は、大陸国家から海洋国家への転換が、大昔から度々試みられてきたが殆ど成功していないという歴史的な事実を指摘しながらも、希有な成功例として古代ペルシャを挙げ、中国はこれらの歴史から教訓を導くことができることを示唆している。</p>
<p>抄　訳</p>
<p>大陸国家から海洋国家への転換が、大昔から度々試みられてきたが、殆ど成功した例がない。この史実が、海軍を膨張させている中国に教訓を与える。</p>
<p>欧州の海軍力が急速に衰退すると共に米海軍が量的に減り、そして中国が海に進出しつつある。このことは、6 世紀前に始まった非常に大きな歴史的傾向、つまり中国が内方に退き、欧州の海軍拡張が西洋化として世界的に広まった歴史的傾向が終わることである。</p>
<p>今、久々に難しい議論が北京に広がっている。中国は大陸国家か？ 海洋国家か？ 或いはその両方か？ そして、地勢に関しては、どの程度まで政治的かつ戦略的に固執し、大陸国家としての文化が、海洋国家としての発展を拘束するだろうか？</p>
<p>1　歴史的な洞察</p>
<p>古代ペルシャは、海洋国家としての伝統に欠けていたが、その指導者達は新しい考えに対して寛容であった。始め彼らは海を障壁と考えていたが、次第に物流・情報伝達（Communication）のハイウェーと見なすようになり、広範囲にわたり海軍の経験を積んでいった。彼らは、財源を多く充当することにより、歴史上初めて真に有効な海軍を構築した。その努力の規模と経済的活力は、今日の中国に匹敵するかもしれない。</p>
<p>オスマン帝国は、相当な資源を持っていたが、大陸主義国家の枠を克服できなかった。オスマン帝国の国境地域は脅威に曝され続けており、注意力と資源を使い果たしていた。オスマン帝国が使用した艪櫂のガレー船は、地中海において地上兵力を輸送するには適していたが、より広く、かつ、陸地による制約が少ないインド洋には適さなかった。オスマン帝国は、経済のグローバル化に追従できなかったため、初めての世界市場において、これを支配する機会を逸してしまった。</p>
<p>その後、海洋活動の中心が大西洋に移り現代に至る。この間、幾つかの大陸国家が海洋国家への転換を試みたが成功は極限られた。例えば、フランスは４度海洋国家への転換を試みたが何れも失敗した。仏中央政府の脆弱性と組織の混乱は、慢性的な問題であり、反商業的かつ反皇帝的な考え方がエリートの間に蔓延し、脆弱な財政システムは海軍の構築と維持を妨げ、陸・海軍の関係は、首尾一貫して無きに等しかった。このフランスのケースは、特に中国に対して重要な示唆を与えるかもしれない。先ずこの例は、内部の思想統一が、海洋国家へ向けた前提条件であることを示している。また中国はフランスの様に良港に恵まれ海へのアクセスも整っているが、内陸部の資本と内陸部の水路システムもまた、国家として海を越えた商業への依存度を軽減してきた。フランスと同様に中国は、比較的明確に三分された海洋の境界線を持ち、その夫々に配置された艦隊が、上手く連携して敵を打ち破ってきた歴史がある。両国とも、そのエリート達全体にわたり海軍力又は海洋への伸展に対する懐疑心又は徹底した敵意があったと共に、発作的な海軍開発の歴史がある。大陸主義についての上手い説明振りは、「エリートの積年の思い込みが、陸の国境に対する脅威感であり、またチャンスも陸の国境によって齎らされる」というものである。</p>
<p>ドイツ帝国の大洋への進出は、非友好国に制されたチョークポイントがあるために制約されてきた。ドイツは、この制約を回避するために海軍の整備を企てたが、その結果、国自身を拡張し過ぎてしまった。海軍は、単に大陸二正面への挑戦に報いることができなかったに過ぎない。このドイツのケースは、中国にも幾つか当て嵌まるものがあり、また一つの大きな相違点もある。両国とも古代海洋国家の伝統を持つが、何れも地政学的には新参者であった。両国とも包括的（経済的、技術的及び教育的）な中庸を以って海洋国家への転換を支えた。その中心は、海洋経済の資本家達に支持された政府主導の工業化であった。しかしながら、史実から結論付けられる大きな相違点は、中国が損害の大きい強国との戦争を避けてきたことである。</p>
<p>2　中国の経験</p>
<p>歴史家達は、中国が海洋を軽視してきたことを誇張する嫌いがある。南宋朝時代（1127-1279）には、その首都であり長江（Yangtze River）の海港である杭州（Hangzhou）があった。モンゴルが宋を倒し元朝（1271-1368）として継承した時代、大きな造船所が十分な海軍力を支えていた。モンゴルは、成功こそしなかったが中世時代に最大の水陸両用作戦を、日本、ベトナム及びジャワに対して行った。1300 年代、中国は、最先端の技術革新を造船と海軍装備に齎し、磁気羅針儀を発明した。</p>
<p>明朝時代には一貫して強力な海軍が存在した。明は中国南部の敵に対して海軍力を行使して広い範囲で戦勝し、初めてその地位を確立した。1363年のハ陽湖（Lake Poyang）の戦いは、数少ない中国の海戦の歴史の中で最も大きく決定的な戦いであり、両者とも数百隻の戦舟が含まれていた。</p>
<p>明時代における海洋活動は、宦官提督鄭和（Eunuch Admiral Zheng He）（1405-33） の7 度の航海でピークを迎える。永楽帝に支持された鄭和は、数百隻の船と数千人の人員、そしてあるものは440ft 以上の船長、2 万トンの排水量を持つ史上最大の木造船からなる遠征部隊を率いた。これらの航海は、交易を促進し、属国と宗主国の関係を再開させ、ハード及びソフト・パワーを顕示し、そして明の旗をマラッカ海峡、インド洋を越えペルシャ湾及びアフリカ東岸にまで翻させた。しかしながら鄭和の経費のかかる航海は、明に具体的な利益を齎したものの、危険と無駄が多いとする朝廷の官僚主義の反対により、永楽帝の死後彼の航海は、1 回だけで終わった。</p>
<p>1500 年代、過酷で不平等に強要される朝廷の勅令が、遠隔地に及ぶ海洋商業を妨げ、中国や海外の商人達を海賊に駆り立ててしまった。明は、総合力としても、また交易力としても依然として大きな海洋力を有していたにもかかわらず、海洋における主導権を失い、倭寇の襲撃が活発（1540 ～1580 年代）であった自国沿岸からこれらの海賊を駆逐し、海洋商業を阻害していた上記勅令を廃止するのに年月を要した。</p>
<p>清時代（1644-1912）の中国の地政学的方向は、北洋水師（Beiyang Navy）の長であった李鴻章（Li Hongzhang）と新疆奪回の遠征軍指揮官左宗棠（Zuo Zongtang）の論争で決した。清は、結局大陸国家を選択し、その後、国家と李将軍の双方ともがその結果に苦しめられた。清は、内部に政治的問題があったことに加えて、アジアに台頭したイギリス、フランス及び日本の海軍力の脅威に突然対決させられてしまった。清は、西欧列強の近代的な海軍による海洋での挑戦に対して無力であることを証明してしまった。最初のアヘン戦争（1839-42）では、中国の河川水路網の中心部に浸透した英国艦隊が、中国の国内通商を停止させると脅迫し、英国は、平和を請う中国政権から強制的に香港を獲得した。清は、最終的に海外から艦船を購入したが、信頼性の高いインフラもなく、また、戦闘に於いて効果的にこれらを運用するプロフェッショナルな海軍でもなく、悲惨な結果を招いた。</p>
<p>1880 年代には、中国の初期の艦隊がフランスに敗北し、中国のインドシナにおける伝統的な影響力を封じてしまった。中国は、この世紀最後の10 年間に、相当な海軍力を取得・整備したにもかかわらず、急激に近代化する近隣の島国にも対応できなくなり、日清戦争（1894-95）では屈辱的な敗北を喫し、台湾を失いそして朝鮮を日本の保護国に導いてしまった。</p>
<p>西欧の海洋列強からと同様に、北方からはロシアによる圧迫があり、清の朝廷は、通商権と領土譲与に関して高まる要求に対し、譲歩を余儀なくされた。1905 年、中国の与り知らぬところだが酷い被害を蒙ることになった日露戦争が、戦略的に重要な位置にあった旅順港（Port Arthur）に繋がる地域である中国の領土及び近隣水域で勃発した。</p>
<p>これら全ての事態の展開は、この王朝の基盤と、実際に皇帝自身の合法性を致命的に弱めてしまった。1911 年における清の没落は、長期にわたり内部に不安定を導いた。清の海洋における敗北は、斯様にしてアヘン戦争に始まり、引き続いて西洋海軍からの技術導入に失敗したことに由来し、このことは、ライバル日本と極めて対照的である。</p>
<p>3　大陸主義だった冷戦時代</p>
<p>冷戦の間、中国海軍の発展は、東アジアにおける海洋での米国の優位性に拘束され、後には、内政の失敗とソ連との関係悪化により拘束された。中国海軍は、主に地上兵力を支援してきたが、1988 年頃までは独自の戦略すらなかった。</p>
<p>中国共産党のエリート達を概観すると、陸上戦闘の経験によって鍛えられたものであり、海軍戦闘が如何なるものか、或いは、高度な技術が近代的な海軍戦闘（或いは航空戦闘）を決定的なものとするということを知っている党の主要な指揮官が殆どいなかった。毛沢東（Mao Zedong）の作った1949-50 年の台湾侵略計画でさえ、それが中国当時の或いは先々に予見しうる能力を遥かに超えたものであったことが、即座に露見した。</p>
<p>中国の朝鮮戦争への介入は、資源配分と指導者の注意を地上戦闘へと向きを変えた。中国が戦勝した（但し、準備不足、かつ、比類なく不利な地勢のインド陸軍に対して）1962 年のインドとの国境戦争は、毛沢東思想の中国が大陸に焦点を向けた他の理由となった。</p>
<p>何を以ってして北京政府が事実上ゼロから近代的な海軍を構築し得たかと言えば、それが唯一可能だったのは、1960 年に終了したソ連からの技術支援供与であった。</p>
<p>中国にとって安全保障上最大の脅威が、実際にソ連自身によって齎されたことが、1960 年代の過程の中で明らかになった。1969 年、核武装した2 国の共産主義国がシベリアにて連続的に国境での小競り合いを続け、より大きな紛争（この時、ソ連は、中国の核装備部隊と施設への先制攻撃を熟考していたらしい）を引き起こす可能性があった。冷戦が終わるまで、両国は、共通する国境線に沿って、相当な通常兵器部隊を維持した。中国経済の深刻な発達不全の下で、中国の軍事的資源は厳しく拘束され、そして、地上軍に最上位の優先度が与えられた。</p>
<p>その他に、冷戦時代の中国が陸上中心的であったことの要素があるとすれば、この時代に続いた北京政府の米国との機能上の友好関係であり、これは、アジア海域においてソ連海軍によって齎された些細な程ではないが、潜在的脅威に対して、それ以外に問題になってきたことより、楽観的な見方を中国に許容したのかもしれない。</p>
<p>4　海洋国家への方向転換</p>
<p>鄧小平（Deng Xiaoping）時代とその後を見るに、中国は最終的に永続的な海洋発展を遂げるという歴史的な困難を克服できるか？と言う疑問が残る。中国の海洋での通商の軌跡が、当にこの真相を示唆しているかもしれない。海洋発展が極めて活動的な商業海運と造船部門により導かれてきたことは、海軍発展に対して次々に大きな相乗効果を生み、それゆえ海に進出した他の大陸国家には往々にして欠けていた海洋国家への転換に対する健全な基盤を齎している。</p>
<p>ドイツやロシアのような大陸国家の造船産業と異なり、中国のそれは、国家に後押しされるというより、商業的利益に牽引されて駆り立てられたのである。中国は、世界的大造船業者として、総トン数の面で韓国を上回りつつあり、世界市場の約50％を制している。しかしながら、中国は、偉大な海洋国家であるオランダ、イギリス及びアメリカに追いつき、商業造船の全てのレベルにおいて優位を占め世界的な勢力にまで地位を上げるには、依然として程遠い。このレベルに到達するには、中国は、その市場シェアだけでなく、担当者レベルの品格及び革新能力も向上させなければならない。ただし、造船産業のグローバル化が、技術的進歩の新たな好機を齎すだろうけれども・・・・。</p>
<p>中国は、数世紀振りに、有利な条件下でこの30 年間の結果として運用可能な近代海軍を本気で開発している。冷戦の終焉とソ連の崩壊と共に、中国は、最早、内方のアジア国境線において存在した脅威に直面することはなくなった。その代わりに、最も重要な安全保障上の関心事は、明らかに海洋領域への転換の過程にある。第一に、海洋における地域国家との領域紛争が先鋭化する恐れがあり、それは1974 年、南シナ海の西沙諸島（Paracel Islands）を巡り中共（PRC）とベトナムとの衝突に始まった。第二に、民主主義に向いた台湾における国内政治の進展が、長年にわたり「一つの中国」政策を掲げて、事実上のそして法律上の台湾の独立に対抗してきた中国を追い込む恐れがあることである。同時に、台湾の擁護者として明らかに進んで行動する米国があり、特に、1995-96 年の台湾海峡危機において、中国は、東アジア海域における紛争に際し米国海軍が参戦するという決定的な可能性に直面させられた。</p>
<p>中国海軍は、強力な接近拒否能力（Anti-Access Capabilities）持つ地域海軍力になりつつある。しかしながら、風説の域を超えないが、近接した周辺海域を大幅に超えてハイエンドの戦闘能力を発揮するに必要な資源と人材への投資はしてこなかった。</p>
<p>5　地理学的教訓</p>
<p>中国及びその他の大陸国家が海への進出を試みた歴史を調べると、普遍的な教訓がある。</p>
<p>第一に、地理条件が重要である。例え技術的進歩の最中でもだ。大陸国家は、一般に、その地理的条件から不利益を蒙ってきた。そして、その動かしようのない地理的不利から脱却すべく、野心的で戦略的なプロジェクトに度々挑戦してきた（中国が構築した万里の長城、京杭大運河及び三峡ダム、そして現在建設中のビルマ縦断石油パイプラインである）。中国は、合理的に観て多くの点で海洋を利用する権利を有しているが、中国と海で接する近隣諸国の全てと未解決の利権問題を抱えている。中国は、依然としてその多くの戦略的思想家の観点からすると“ 島々の鎖” で縁取りされたところに留まっている。</p>
<p>陸の国境は、また大きな潜在的挑戦を象徴している。中国は、今は安定してものの、インド及びベトナムとは領土戦争を戦ってきており、そして、ロシアとは今後不和に直面するかも知れない。新疆（Xinjiang）とチベットにおいて進行中の民族の自治・分離主義者の動きも、心配の種であろう。</p>
<p>第二は、海洋国家への転換は、困難かつ危険な過程があり、これを十分に成し得た近代の大陸国家はない。機会費用が大きく、そして勇気を失わせるような巨大な勢力が多々存在する。全ての歴史の中で、海洋国家への転換に成功し不朽にしたのは、ペルシャとローマだけである。これらの場合でも、帝国は、元の大陸主義国家としての痕跡を残しており、少なくともある程度は、「一度大陸国家であったものは、常に大陸国家である」。海洋国家への転換が完全に実現したことを示すのは難しい。ペルシャ人は、彼らの海軍を攻撃的な手段として実際には決して使用せず、むしろ、今日の統合海上作戦と呼ばれるべきものに適応させ、大規模なペルシャ陸軍を敵の沿岸に沿って前進させるために彼等の艦隊を後方支援や、側面防御に充当した。ローマ人も常設艦隊を創設（帝国の下でのみ生起）し、海上警備体制を確立したのは遅かった。</p>
<p>第三に、偉大な勢力が形成されることについての地政・戦略的見解としては、地理的な適正性によるだけでなく、経済的要素によっても形成される。天然資源とそれを利用した生産によって生じた富の総計は、人口を確かなレベルに維持し、財政的資源と産業技術の組み合わせと相俟って軍事的能力になる。古代ペルシャは、大きな富が大きな海軍を獲得できることを最初に示した。中国は、資源とこの様な資源配分を可能とする技術を持っている。ソ連や他の大陸国家の嘗ての状況とは異なり、中国は、強力な経済的基盤と共に包括的な国力を有している。海軍の発展に関する長期的な取り組みは、経済的にも合理的と評価される。疑問は、中国によるその様な能力の獲得が、それを脅威とみなす国際的な反響と同様に他に差し迫った要求のある中で、事実賢明かどうかということだ。</p>
<p>第四の重大な要素は、国家の戦略的見通しである。これは、国際的及び国内的考察によって形成されるものであり、一義的には政権存続の問題である。複数の対立する問題を引き起こす場合は、国家としてバランスを保ち、戦略目標の優先順位を決めることが往々にして難しい。中国の場合、長く続いてきた大陸主義者達の国内安定への執心が、昨今の経済発展によって徐々に均衡が保たれ、偉大な力となった地位が「屈辱の世紀」を払拭し、中国を正当な位置に戻すだろう。</p>
<p>第五は、リーダーシップであり、これは恐らく、海洋国家への転換を活性化する或いは欲求不満に陥らせる最も重要な要素であろう。鄭和を活性化し、清の改革者達を欲求不満に陥らせたものである。劉華清上将（Admiral Liu Huaqing）は、鄧小平の支持を得て、限られてはいたが人民解放軍海軍の地位を段階的に向上させた。中国の指導者達は、通商の保護と海上交通路の重要性に関わるアルフレッド・セイヤー・マハンの考えを明らかに高く評価しているようだ。今日、中国における意見の全体的傾向としては、長い歴史の中で何時の時代よりも、海洋国家への転換に対して好意的である。しかしながら、反対に作用する要素も残っている。</p>
<p>6　海洋国家への転換を果たすか</p>
<p>最終的に成功する海洋国家への転換は、海軍戦略と運用上の術力によって具現化される。大陸国家は、大抵海洋国家に適合することはできず、異なる取り組み方をする。オスマン帝国は、地中海の島々を獲得するために水陸両用の沿岸戦作戦を用いた。中国に当て嵌めれば、これは、台湾、澎湖諸島（Penghus）、金門島（Jinmen）及び馬祖列島（Mazu）を除き国家主義者を全ての島々から追放した中国の国内での軍事作戦（1949-55）に相当する。中国の短/ 中距離弾道ミサイル開発（例えばDF-21D 対艦弾道ミサイル）は、｢海を制するに陸を用いる｣というこの取り組みの最新版であることを幾分示している。中国には継続した制約があり海軍の発展を独特な中国的特徴にしてきたが、これは最早致命的なものにはならない。中国の海軍戦闘は、米国のものと極めて異なって見えるかもしれないが、中国独自の状況に適用する場合には、成功するかもしれない。</p>
<p>以前に海洋国家たるべく試みたことがある大陸国家の経験は、概して欠点とされてきた。従って中国は、戦略的に逆風の中を帆走しているようなものだ。北京政府内での議論の下、この様な転換の残りの部分がどのようなるかは、大変幅広いものがある。しかし、依然として中国は明らかに海に向かっている。中国は、今、海洋国家への転換を目指した嘗ての前任者達には一般に欠けていた次に示す幾つかの利点に恵まれている。</p>
<p>　・逞しい海洋経済<br />
　・活動的な造船産業<br />
　・大陸の近隣諸国のほぼ全てと国境線が確定<br />
　・ 海洋発展を自然現象として支持し法的拘束をしない指導者</p>
<p>中国は、正に方向転換をしたところであり、本物の海洋国家へと転換の途次にある。もしこれが、本当にそのケースだとすれば、画期的なことである。もし、これが唯一無二でないとしても、この2 千年の歴史の中で、重要な出来事に違いない。中国は歴史から教訓を学んできただろが、また、その過ちを繰り返すように運命付けられてきたわけでもない。</p>
<p>（文責・挿入写真等　編集部）</p></div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.andrewerickson.com/2009/07/china-goes-to-sea-maritime-transformation-in-comparative-historical-perspective/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>China’s Energy Strategy: The Impact on Beijing’s Maritime Policies (CMSI Vol. 2)</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewerickson.com/2008/06/china%e2%80%99s-energy-strategy-the-impact-on-beijing%e2%80%99s-maritime-policies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.andrewerickson.com/2008/06/china%e2%80%99s-energy-strategy-the-impact-on-beijing%e2%80%99s-maritime-policies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 02:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andrewserickson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edited Volumes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japanese Language 日本語]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewserickson.wordpress.com/?p=187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gabriel B. Collins, Andrew S. Erickson, Lyle J. Goldstein, and William S. Murray, eds., China’s Energy Strategy: The Impact on Beijing’s Maritime Policies (Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press, 2008).
Japanese language summary translation now available: “書籍3: 中国のエネルギー戦略–北京の海洋政策への影響.”
Coauthor, “Introduction,” pp. xi-xix; with Gabriel Collins, of “Chinese Efforts to Create a National Tanker Fleet,” 81-114; and, with Lyle [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gabriel B. Collins, Andrew S. Erickson, Lyle J. Goldstein, and William S. Murray, eds.,<strong><em> <a title="China's Energy Strategy--USNI Webpage" href="http://www.usni.org/store/item.asp?ITEM_ID=1692" target="_blank">China’s Energy Strategy: The Impact on Beijing’s Maritime Policies</a></em></strong> (Annapolis, MD: <a title="China's Energy Strategy--USNI Book News" href="http://andrewserickson.files.wordpress.com/2009/08/chinas-energy-strategy_information.pdf" target="_blank">Naval Institute Press</a>, 2008).</p>
<p>Japanese language summary translation now available: “<a title="“書籍3: 中国のエネルギー戦略--北京の海洋政策への影響” [Book 3: China’s Energy Strategy: The Impact on Beijing’s Maritime Policies], p. 29." onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.janafa.com/book-38/page-29.pdf');" href="http://www.janafa.com/book-38/page-29.pdf" target="_blank">書籍3: 中国のエネルギー戦略–北京の海洋政策への影響</a>.”</p>
<p>Coauthor, “Introduction,” pp. xi-xix; with Gabriel Collins, of “Chinese Efforts to Create a National Tanker Fleet,” 81-114; and, with Lyle Goldstein and Gabriel Collins, of “Chinese Naval Analysts Consider the Energy Question,” 299-335.</p>
<p><strong>SAMPLE CHAPTER:</strong> Dan Blumenthal, <strong>“<a title="China's Energy Strategy--Blumenthal Chapter--Concerns with Respect to China's Energy Policy" href="http://www.andrewerickson.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/Chinas-Energy-Strategy_Blumenthal-Chapter_Concerns-with-Respect-to-Chinas-Energy-Policy.pdf " target="_blank">Concerns with Respect to China’s Energy Policy</a>,”</strong> 418-36.</p>
<p><strong><a title="Table of Contents for China's Energy Strategy" href="http://www.andrewerickson.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Chinas-Energy-Strategy_Table-of-Contents.pdf" target="_blank">TABLE OF CONTENTS</a></strong></p>
<p><em><span id="1591143306_vVsYFLeuXz_commentText">China</span>’<span id="1591143306_vVsYFLeuXz_commentText">s rapid growth has prompted Beijing to undertake an aggressive search for resources on a truly global scale. The resource most directly tied to continued growth in China is energy. Rising consumer appetites in China, coupled with occasional rolling blackouts due to spiraling demand in Chinese cities, have prompted intense anxieties in China concerning energy security. Since 80 percent of Chinese fossil fuel imports pass by ship through the Malacca Strait, an important component of Beijing</span>’<span id="1591143306_vVsYFLeuXz_commentText">s concerns have come to be known in China as the </span>“<span id="1591143306_vVsYFLeuXz_commentText">Malacca Dilemma.</span>”<span id="1591143306_vVsYFLeuXz_commentText"> This book draws on America</span>’<span id="1591143306_vVsYFLeuXz_commentText">s finest experts in the fields of economics, energy, China studies, and naval strategy in order to explore China</span>’<span id="1591143306_vVsYFLeuXz_commentText">s </span>“<span id="1591143306_vVsYFLeuXz_commentText">Malacca Dilemma</span>”<span id="1591143306_vVsYFLeuXz_commentText"> and its implications for global maritime security. The essays in this volume draw from a wide variety of viewpoints, but a central theme of the analyses is that the United States needs to be concerned that China is drawing upon much of the world</span>’<span id="1591143306_vVsYFLeuXz_commentText">s remaining oil reserves for its exclusive use. The resulting competition for this diminishing resource could lead to energy insecurity and may support other tendencies toward rivalry that in turn could foster a naval arms race neither side seeks. One of the major conclusions of this study is that there is, in fact, ample room for Sino-American energy dialogue and cooperation in the maritime domain and that the competition for limited energy sources like oil need not lead to conflict. </span></em></p>
<p><span><strong>BLURBS</strong></span></p>
<p>“<span id="1591143306_vVsYFLeuXz_commentText">This book is a comprehensive assessment of China</span>’<span id="1591143306_vVsYFLeuXz_commentText">s overall and maritime energy security strategies; as important, it provides clear and detailed guides to judge the nature of future Chinese naval developments and overall Chinese security strategy.</span>”</p>
<p><strong>&#8211;Admiral Dennis Blair, U.S. Navy (Ret.), former Commander, U.S. Pacific Command </strong></p>
<p>“<span id="1591143306_vVsYFLeuXz_commentText">&#8230;</span><span id="1591143306_vVsYFLeuXz_commentText">a necessary read for anyone interested in the future of the People</span>’<span id="1591143306_vVsYFLeuXz_commentText">s Republic of China</span>’<span id="1591143306_vVsYFLeuXz_commentText">s energy development and its strategic implications for the U.S., with particular attention to maritime development in both countries. The book tackles the prospects for China</span>’<span id="1591143306_vVsYFLeuXz_commentText">s energy development in a remarkably comprehensive, nuanced fashion. It evaluates Chinese perspectives and prospects, analyzes the PRC</span>’<span id="1591143306_vVsYFLeuXz_commentText">s capabilities in each relevant global region, and dissects the PLA Navy</span>’<span id="1591143306_vVsYFLeuXz_commentText">s capabilities with respect to energy security issues. The authors, including those writing for the final section, which analyzes the implications for U.S. policy, carefully identify inevitable uncertainties and analytical disagreements. On balance, the book stresses the room for U.S.-China energy cooperation in the maritime domain. Importantly, it provides the rich array of data and analysis necessary for readers to develop their own deeply informed perspectives on this issue.</span>”</p>
<p><strong>&#8211;Dr. Kenneth Lieberthal, Arthur F. Thurnau Professor of Political Science, University of Michigan and former Senior Director for Asia on the National Security Council </strong></p>
<p>“<span id="1591143306_vVsYFLeuXz_commentText">Comprehensive, diverse and essential for national security professionals&#8230; a subject we must understand clearly for our Asia-Pacific future.</span>”</p>
<p><strong>&#8211;Admiral Thomas B. Fargo, U.S. Navy (Ret.), former Commander, U.S. Pacific Command</strong></p>
<p><span><strong>REVIEWS</strong></span></p>
<p>“The China Maritime Studies Institute… is fast becoming a center of excellence for research on all aspects of the Chinese navy. … all the contributions are excellent… The beauty of this book comes in different forms. As the editors indicate in their introduction, the contributors do not always agree. … Important statistics are also provided. …provides the latest scholarship. Further enhancing the book’s value is that the contributors are all actively involved in shaping this multifaceted debate in their respective institutions. … This reviewer could not exaggerate the importance of this book in understanding the issues shaping the development of the Chinese navy.”</p>
<p><strong>&#8211;Richard Desjardins (Canadian civil servant), <a title="Review of China’s Energy Strategy in Joint Force Quarterly" href="http://www.ndu.edu/press/jfq_pages/editions/i57/desjardins.pdf" target="_blank"><em>Joint Force Quarterly</em></a>, issue 57, second quarter (2010): 132-33.</strong></p>
<p>“[the authors] have described the drivers of China’s quest for a limited power projection capability—and they did so well before Beijing’s December 2008 decision to deploy a series of task groups to the Gulf of Aden in order to protect shipping from an onslaught of pirate attacks. … This volume makes the case that Beijing’s desire to ensure steady and secure access to the energy resources required to continue the momentum of China’s economic growth will ‘compel the PLAN [People’s Liberation Army Navy] to be used increasingly in nonconflict situations in a wider variety of regions.’ The PLAN’s actions today certainly support this argument; Beijing’s naval task groups in the Gulf of Aden are operating thousands of miles from China to protect merchant shipping, much of which is transporting oil. … details how important maritime commerce is to China’s continued economic development.”</p>
<p><strong>&#8211;Scott W. Bray (the U.S. Navy’s Senior Intelligence Officer for China), </strong><strong>“<a title="Review of CMSI Vols. 1-3 in Asia Policy" href="http://www.nbr.org/publications/asia_policy/ap9/AP9_I_CMSIBRE.pdf" target="_blank">Turning to the Sea… This Time to Stay</a>,” Book Review Essay, <em>Asia Policy</em>, No. 9 (January 2010): 167-72.</strong></p>
<p>“…it is a relief to read a mass of carefully considered common sense such as is contained in this fine book. It is refreshing to be reminded that so many of America’s military, especially naval, intellectuals can be so clear headed and rational. …Defence planners and warriors who are currently or likely to be involved in the Indo-Pacific regions should study this book very carefully.”</p>
<p><strong>&#8211;<em><a title="China's Energy Strategy--Ships &amp; Shipping Review" href="http://www.bairdmaritime.com" target="_blank">Ships &amp; Shipping</a></em> (July 2009): 38.</strong></p>
<p>“…the book is superb, rich in information and subtle analysis, and should be of interest to all students of geopolitics.”</p>
<p><strong>&#8211;Arthur Waldron, <em><a title="China's Energy Strategy--Arthur Waldron Book Review" href="http://pacificaffairs.ubc.ca/recent/v82no2.html" target="_blank">Pacific Affairs</a></em>, Vol. 82, No. 2 (Summer 2009): 328-30.</strong></p>
<p>“The importance of the energy factor in politics today can hardly be called into question. … How much does&#8230; energy affect&#8230; military doctrine? How does the energy vulnerability of the state influence the modernization of the army? As far as China is concerned, these questions are answered at the beginning of the complex research by Gabriel Collins, Andrew Erickson, Lyle Goldstein, and William Murray…. This approach makes the book&#8230; exciting reading and gives a lot of food for thought and discussion. The authors are fellows of the U.S. Naval [War] College and are famous for their studies on various aspects of China’s energy strategy, including its impact on [the] maritime strategy of the country.”</p>
<p><strong>&#8211;Yevgeny Petelin, “<a title="Yevgeny Petelin, “Energy at the Edge of War and Peace,” Security Index 87.15 (Spring 2009): 147-49." href="http://www.pircenter.org/kosdata/page_doc/p1826_2.pdf" target="_blank">Energy at the Edge of War and Peace</a>,” <em>Security Index</em> 87.15 (Spring 2009): 147-49.</strong></p>
<p>“The editors achieve their task of examining China’s energy security and naval modernization and their impact on Sino-American relations. …this book is highly recommended.”</p>
<p><strong>&#8211;Andrew Forbes, <em><a title="China's Energy Strategy--Andrew Forbes Review" href="http://www.mun.ca/mhp/Dec-2008.htm" target="_blank">International Journal of Maritime History</a></em> (December 2008): 478-79.</strong></p>
<p>“…this is an invaluable book for anyone wanting to understand China’s economy in general and its maritime strategy in particular.”</p>
<p><strong>&#8211;David N. Griffiths, <em><a title="China's Energy Strategy--David Griffiths Review" href="http://naval.review.cfps.dal.ca/archive/3477981-0103197/vol4num3art11.pdf" target="_blank">Canadian Naval Review</a></em>, Vol. 4, No. 3 (Fall 2008): 42-43.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.andrewerickson.com/2008/06/china%e2%80%99s-energy-strategy-the-impact-on-beijing%e2%80%99s-maritime-policies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>China’s Future Nuclear Submarine Force (CMSI Vol. 1)</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewerickson.com/2007/04/china%e2%80%99s-future-nuclear-submarine-force/</link>
		<comments>http://www.andrewerickson.com/2007/04/china%e2%80%99s-future-nuclear-submarine-force/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andrewserickson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edited Volumes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japanese Language 日本語]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewserickson.wordpress.com/?p=191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Andrew S. Erickson, Lyle J. Goldstein, William S. Murray, and Andrew R. Wilson, eds., China’s Future Nuclear Submarine Force (Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press, 2007).
Japanese summary translation now available: “書籍1: 将来の中国原子力潜水艦部隊.”
Coauthor, “Introduction,” pp. ix-xvi; with Lyle Goldstein, of “China’s Future Nuclear Submarine Force: Insights from Chinese Writings,” pp. 182-211; and, with Andrew Wilson, of “China’s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Andrew S. Erickson, Lyle J. Goldstein, William S. Murray, and Andrew R. Wilson, eds.,</strong><em><strong> </strong><a title="China's Future Nuclear Submarine Force--USNI Webpage" href="http://www.usni.org/store/item.asp?ITEM_ID=1316" target="_blank"><strong>China’s Future Nuclear Submarine Force</strong></a></em><strong> (Annapolis, MD: </strong><a title="China's Future Nuclear Submarine Force--USNI Book News" href="http://andrewserickson.files.wordpress.com/2009/08/chinas-future-nuclear-submarine-force_information.pdf" target="_blank"><strong>Naval Institute Press</strong></a><strong>, 2007).</strong></p>
<p>Japanese summary translation now available: “<a title="“書籍1: 将来の中国原子力潜水艦部隊” [Book 1: China’s Future Nuclear Submarine Force], p. 26." onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.janafa.com/book-38/page-26.pdf');" href="http://www.janafa.com/book-38/page-26.pdf" target="_blank">書籍1: 将来の中国原子力潜水艦部隊</a>.”</p>
<p>Coauthor, “Introduction,” pp. ix-xvi; with Lyle Goldstein, of “China’s Future Nuclear Submarine Force: Insights from Chinese Writings,” pp. 182-211; and, with Andrew Wilson, of “China’s Aircraft Carrier Dilemma,” pp. 229-269.</p>
<p>These and several other chapters are required reading for the Naval War College <a title="Naval War College Strategy and Policy Department" href="http://www.usnwc.edu/Departments---Colleges/Strategy-and-Policy.aspx" target="_blank">Strategy and Policy Department</a>’s Senior and Intermediate Leadership Courses.</p>
<p>Volume cited in <em>Wikipedia’s</em> <span style="outline-width: 0px; outline-style: initial; outline-color: initial; font-size: 14px; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial; padding: 0px; margin: 0px; border: 0px initial initial;">“<a style="outline-width: 0px; outline-style: initial; outline-color: initial; font-size: 14px; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; text-decoration: none; color: #4b729b; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial; padding: 0px; margin: 0px; border: 0px initial initial;" title="China's Future Nuclear Submarine Force Cited in Wikipedia Entry" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_094_submarine" target="_blank">Type 094 Submarine</a>” </span><span style="outline-width: 0px; outline-style: initial; outline-color: initial; font-size: 14px; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial; padding: 0px; margin: 0px; border: 0px initial initial;">entry.</span></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-weight: normal;"><strong></strong></span><a title="Table of Contents for China's Future Nuclear Submarine Force" href="http://www.andrewerickson.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Chinas-Future-Nuclear-Submarine-Force_Table-of-Contents.pdf" target="_blank">TABLE OF CONTENTS</a></strong></p>
<p><span id="1591143268_vVsYFLeuXz_commentText"><em>The trajectory of Chinese nuclear propulsion for submarines may be one of the best single indicators of whether or not China intends to become a genuine global military power. Nuclear submarines, with their unparalleled survivability, remain ideal platforms for persistent operations in far-flung sea areas and offer an efficient means for China to strengthen deterrence and project power.</em></span></p>
<p><em>This collection of essays presents the latest thinking of leading experts on the emergence of a modern nuclear submarine fleet in China. Each contribution is packed with authoritative data and cogent analysis. The book has been compiled by four professors at the U.S. Naval War College who are co-founders of the college</em><em>’</em><span id="1591143268_vVsYFLeuXz_commentText"><em>s</em><em> China Maritime Studies Institute (CMSI). </em></span></p>
<p><em>Given the opaque nature of China</em><em>’</em><span id="1591143268_vVsYFLeuXz_commentText"><em>s undersea warfare development, readers will benefit from this penetrating investigation that considers the potential impact of revolutionary changes in Chinese nuclear submarine capabilities. This book is essential reading for everyone interested in China&#8217;s foreign and defense policies; in the future of the U.S. Navy; and in the defense of the United States. </em></span></p>
<p><span><strong>BLURBS</strong></span></p>
<p>“<span id="1591143268_vVsYFLeuXz_commentText">Unknowns about China</span>’<span id="1591143268_vVsYFLeuXz_commentText">s Navy, especially its nuclear submarines, perplex our security planners. <em>China</em></span><em>’</em><span id="1591143268_vVsYFLeuXz_commentText"><em>s Future Nuclear Submarine Force</em> presents the most accurate information&#8211;and the most savvy analysis&#8211;available. This thoughtful compendium is vital to any serious discussion of the PLA Navy.</span>”</p>
<p><strong>&#8211;Adm. Joseph W. Prueher, USN (Ret.), Former Commander-in-Chief, U.S. Pacific Command and Ambassador to China </strong></p>
<p>“<span id="1591143268_vVsYFLeuXz_commentText">China</span>’<span id="1591143268_vVsYFLeuXz_commentText">s undersea fleet has been sharply focused on coastal defense and sea denial, largely in connection with Taiwan contingencies. With this role now assigned to a fleet of increasingly formidable diesel submarines, China</span>’<span id="1591143268_vVsYFLeuXz_commentText">s growing nuclear submarine fleet may be about to move beyond symbolism and experimentation to take on strategic missions farther from Chinese shores. This exceptionally fine compendium of essays by scholars and practitioners of submarine warfare brings together in one place most of what we know and don</span>’<span id="1591143268_vVsYFLeuXz_commentText">t know about China</span>’<span id="1591143268_vVsYFLeuXz_commentText">s nuclear submarine programs and doctrines. By comparing and contrasting the experiences of the U.S. and Soviet navies, the authors offer informed speculation about the possible roles of both nuclear attack and ballistic missile submarines in the rapidly modernizing People</span>’<span id="1591143268_vVsYFLeuXz_commentText">s Liberation Army Navy, and discuss the implications of differing scenarios for U.S. strategy and force structure. The result is a benchmark study that will both fascinate and inform anyone concerned with the future uses of sea power and the evolution of maritime strategy.</span>”</p>
<p><strong>&#8211;Amb. Chas. W. Freeman Jr., Chairman, Projects International, Inc.<br />
Former U.S. Ambassador to Saudi Arabia and Assistant Secretary of Defense<br />
Chinese interpreter for President Richard M. Nixon</strong></p>
<p><strong>REVIEWS</strong></p>
<p>“shows how the Chinese nuclear navy has developed to date and possible future trajectories it could take. … The texts are well sourced and provide readers with references to conduct more extensive research and reading if desired. In summary, any student of Chinese military developments should read this book.”</p>
<p><strong>&#8211;</strong><strong>Capt. Giles Van Nederveen, USAF (Ret.), <a title="Review of China's Future Nuclear Submarine Force--Strategic Studies Quarterly" href="http://www.au.af.mil/au/ssq/bookreviews/erickson.pdf" target="_blank"><em>Strategic Studies Quarterly</em></a>, <a title="Capt. Giles Van Nederveen, USAF (Ret.), Strategic Studies Quarterly, Vol. 4, No. 1 (Spring 2010)." href="http://afri.au.af.mil/review_full.asp?id=157" target="_blank">Vol. 4, No. 1 (Spring 2010)</a>. </strong></p>
<p>“captures important aspects of China’s submarine force that explain the rationale for Beijing’s large submarine investment, beginning by recounting its maritime goals and doctrine, then examining the applicability of a submarine force to these goals. …raises many important issues that influence the future of China’s nuclear submarine force….”</p>
<p><strong>&#8211;Scott W. Bray (the U.S. Navy’s Senior Intelligence Officer for China), </strong><strong>“<a title="Review of CMSI Vols. 1-3 in Asia Policy" href="http://www.nbr.org/publications/asia_policy/ap9/AP9_I_CMSIBRE.pdf" target="_blank">Turning to the Sea… This Time to Stay</a>,” Book Review Essay, <em>Asia Policy</em>, No. 9 (January 2010): 167-72.</strong></p>
<p>“…offers a wide range of perspectives that provide readers with the opportunity to make their own judgments based on a meticulous analysis of data from Chinese sources<strong>. …</strong> a great and useful effort to understand Chinese strategic planning for the near future.”</p>
<p><strong>&#8211; L. H. Xavier Demián Soto Zuppa, El Colegio de México, A.C., Centro de Estudios de Asia y África (CEAA), <em><a title="L. H. Xavier Demián Soto Zuppa, El Colegio de México, A.C., Centro de Estudios de Asia y África (CEAA), China Review International, 16.4 (2009): 494-501." href="http://muse.jhu.edu/login?uri=/journals/china_review_international/v016/16.4.soto-zuppa.pdf" target="_blank">China Review International</a></em>, 16.4 (2009): 494-501</strong>.</p>
<p>“…provides both novices and experienced scholars an extensive primer on the context of the Chinese nuclear submarine fleet. It is quite readable, well organized, and extremely well documented in all chapters.”</p>
<p><strong>&#8211;Lt. Col. John D. Becker, USA, <em><a title="China's Future Nuclear Submarine Force--Becker Book Review" href="http://www.ndu.edu/inss/Press/jfq_pages/editions/i52/31.pdf" target="_blank">Joint Force Quarterly</a></em>, Vol. 52, No. 1 (2009): 165-66.</strong></p>
<p>“…creative use of Chinese sources has allowed [the authors] to penetrate the veil of secrecy drawn over China’s submarine programme with surprising effectiveness.”</p>
<p><strong>&#8211;Colin Green, <em><a title="China's Future Nuclear Submarine Force--Colin Green Book Review" href="http://pacificaffairs.ubc.ca/recent/v81no1.html" target="_blank">Pacific Affairs</a></em>, Vol. 81, No. 1 (Spring 2008): 111-13.</strong></p>
<p>“…features contributions by some of America’s most prominent (and promising) analysts of PRC naval affairs.”</p>
<p><strong>&#8211;Alan Wachman, <em><a title="China's Future Nuclear Submarine Force--Wachman Book Review" href="http://www.usnwc.edu/getattachment/cdc00189-12f9-448f-a264-63e38db95935/Book-Reviews" target="_blank">Naval War College Review</a></em>, Vol. 61, No. 2 (Spring 2008): 134.</strong></p>
<p>“…offers the most comprehensive open-source analysis yet made public of the transformation of the PLAN and the central role that submarines are likely to play in the years ahead. …has already become the benchmark unclassified study on the development of the PLAN’s sub-surface combat capability.”</p>
<p><strong>&#8211;Richard Scott, “<a title="China’s Submarine Force Awaits a Cultural Revolution" href="http://www8.janes.com/Search/documentView.do?docId=/content1/janesdata/mags/jni/history/jni2008/jni71660.htm@current&amp;pageSelected=allJanes&amp;keyword=%22China’s%20Submarine%20Force%20Awaits%20a%20Cultural%20Revolution%22&amp;backPath=http://search.janes.com/Search&amp;Prod_Name=JNI&amp;" target="_blank">China’s Submarine Force Awaits a Cultural Revolution</a>,” <em>Jane’s Navy International</em>, 1 January 2008.</strong></p>
<p>“…if a book such as <em>China’s Future Nuclear Submarine Force</em> had appeared in 1930 on the subject of Japanese developments in naval air power and force projection, the U.S. ‘battleship admirals’ may have been overruled by the carrier advocates in the critical period leading up to the Pearl Harbor attack of December 7, 1941. This new book&#8230; is that good.”</p>
<p><strong>&#8211;Gregory R. Copley, “<a title="The  Pacific Turns a Pinker Hue" href="http://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=965746307060010;res=IELHSS" target="_blank">The Pacific Turns a Pinker Hue</a>,” <em>Maritime Studies</em>, Issue 156 (September/October 2007): 24-25.</strong></p>
<p>“Reading this excellent volume should waken many of us in the U.S. Navy to remain vigilant and always explore the totality of assets a potential adversary may have, even though they maybe technologically inferior to our own.”</p>
<p><strong>&#8211;<a title="China’s Future Nuclear Submarine Force" href="http://www.dcmilitary.com/stories/051007/waterline_27913.shtml" target="_blank">LCDR Youssef Aboul-Enein</a>, USN, Naval District Washington, DC, 10 May 2007.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.andrewerickson.com/2007/04/china%e2%80%99s-future-nuclear-submarine-force/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>China’s Nuclear Force Modernization</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewerickson.com/2005/10/china%e2%80%99s-nuclear-force-modernization/</link>
		<comments>http://www.andrewerickson.com/2005/10/china%e2%80%99s-nuclear-force-modernization/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2005 16:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andrewserickson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Edited Volumes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewserickson.wordpress.com/?p=22</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lyle J. Goldstein and Andrew S. Erickson, eds., China’s Nuclear Force Modernization, Naval War College Newport Paper No. 22, 2005. Author of “China’s Ballistic Missile Defense Countermeasures: Breaching America’s Great Wall in Space?,” pp. 65-91.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Lyle J. Goldstein and Andrew S. Erickson, eds., </span><span><a href="http://andrewserickson.files.wordpress.com/2008/09/chinas_nuclear_force_-modernization.pdf"><em><strong>China’s Nuclear Force Modernization</strong></em></a>, </span><span>Naval</span><span> War College <em>Newport</em><em> Paper No. 22</em>, 2005. Author of <strong>“China’s Ballistic Missile Defense Countermeasures: Breaching America’s Great Wall in Space?,” </strong>pp. 65-91.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.andrewerickson.com/2005/10/china%e2%80%99s-nuclear-force-modernization/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

