<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Andrew S. Erickson &#187; Opinion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.andrewerickson.com/category/opinion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.andrewerickson.com</link>
	<description>China analysis from original sources</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 21:11:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Facing a New Missile Threat from China (Op-Ed)</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewerickson.com/2009/05/facing-a-new-missile-threat-from-china-op-ed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.andrewerickson.com/2009/05/facing-a-new-missile-threat-from-china-op-ed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 12:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andrewserickson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewserickson.wordpress.com/?p=228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Andrew S. Erickson, “Facing a New Missile Threat from China (Op-Ed): How the U.S. Should Respond to China’s Development of Anti-Ship Ballistic Missile Systems,” CBS News, 28 May 2009.
Authoritative Chinese military documents suggest that Beijing has taken a serious interest in anti-ship ballistic missiles (ASBMs). U.S. government sources state consistently that Beijing is pursuing an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew S. Erickson, <strong>“<a title="Facing a New Missile Threat from China (Op-Ed)" href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/05/28/opinion/main5044876.shtml" target="_blank">Facing a New Missile Threat from China (Op-Ed): How the U.S. Should Respond to China’s Development of Anti-Ship Ballistic Missile Systems</a>,”</strong> <em>CBS News</em>, 28 May 2009.</p>
<p><em>Authoritative Chinese military documents suggest that Beijing has taken a serious interest in anti-ship ballistic missiles (ASBMs). U.S. government sources state consistently that Beijing is pursuing an ASBM based on a variant of the DF-21/CSS-5 medium-range solid propellant ballistic missile (MRBM). The DF-21’s 1,500 km+ range could hold ships at risk in a large maritime area, far beyond Taiwan into the Western Pacific.</p>
<p>If fielded, the ASBM would be just one of a dizzying array of new platforms and weapons systems China has been buying and building since the late 1990s-systems which, taken as a whole, will allow China to assert unprecedented control of its contested maritime periphery. The ASBM, however, differs markedly from the quiet submarines, lethal anti-ship cruise missiles, and copious sea mines which China has been adding to its inventory. It would draw on over half a century of Chinese experience with ballistic missiles, would be fired from mobile, highly concealable platforms, and would have the range to strike targets hundreds of miles from China’s shores.</p>
<p>While probably intended with U.S. carrier strike groups (CSGs) specifically in mind, Chinese ASBM development could have deeply destabilizing consequences that would reverberate far beyond U.S.-China strategic relations.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.andrewerickson.com/2009/05/facing-a-new-missile-threat-from-china-op-ed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
